Annales françaises d'anesthèsie et de rèanimation
-
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jan 1987
Comparative Study[Ambulatory anesthesia and induced abortion. Comparative study of propofol-alfentanyl and ketamine-midazolam combinations].
The use of propofol alone or with alfentanil in the day-case anaesthesia for abortion was compared with that of ketamine with midazolam. Two hundred young women were assigned to two successive series of two groups each. The four groups were: group 1 (2 mg . kg-1 propofol only); group II (0.5 mg . kg-1 ketamine with 0.25 mg . kg-1 midazolam); group III (2 mg . kg-1 propofol with 4 micrograms . kg-1 alfentanil); group IV (1 mg . kg-1 ketamine with 0.1 mg . kg-1 midazolam). ⋯ The four psychomotor and sensory tests were carried out at the 30th min by 95% of the patients in the propofol groups, whereas only 50% of those in the ketamine-midazolam groups did so. Speed and quality were significantly better in the propofol groups. The most frequent adverse effect of propofol was pain during injection in 32 and 14% of patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jan 1987
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Effects of intravenous naloxone on the secondary effects and analgesia after epidural injection of fentanyl].
On demand intravenous naloxone reverses respiratory depression following epidural morphine but does not have any effect on analgesia. This study aimed to assess the action of a preventive naloxone infusion on the side-effects and analgesia induced by epidural fentanyl. Sixteen patients were studied. ⋯ Duration of analgesia was not statistically different in the two groups. This preventive action of intravenous naloxone on the supraspinal adverse effects of epidural fentanyl was not accompanied by a reduction in analgesia. This could lead to widespread use of this analgesic technique.
-
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jan 1987
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Comparative trial of propofol and ketamine in anesthesia for the baths of severely burnt patients].
Ketamine was the normal anaesthetic drug for carrying out the baths of severely burnt patients. It was compared with propofol in a study of 50 patients (greater than 50 UBS) randomly assigned to two groups: 2.5 mg . kg-1 propofol and 2 mg . kg-1 ketamine. The speed of induction was the same for both groups, surgery beginning within the same time intervals. ⋯ Respiratory rate increased, because of the lack of analgesia. Recovery was very quick, complete and with no bothersome adverse effects in the propofol group. These hypercatabolic patients could therefore be fed early postoperatively; also, there was no deleterious psychological interference in these deeply disturbed patients.
-
A case is reported of rapidly resolving pulmonary oedema following post-extubation laryngospasm in a 23 year-old healthy man who underwent emergency resection of a rectal polyp. The laryngospasm occurred immediately after extubation and resolved after administration of curare. The patient was reintubated and auscultation disclosed bilateral coarse and moist rales. ⋯ In addition, this increased negative intra-alveolar pressure was responsible for significant changes in cardiovascular function: right ventricular blood volume, right ventricular ejection fraction and left ventricular after-load increased, while left ventricular ejection fraction decreased. These changes favoured a rise in left atrial and pulmonary blood volumes, with transudation of fluid from the capillaries into the alveoli. Because of the severe consequences of respiratory failure, any patient who suffers acute upper airway obstruction should be observed in the recovery room for at least 3 h in order not to miss this rarely developing, but fortunately rapidly reversible, syndrome.
-
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jan 1987
Case Reports[Myocardial infarction during postoperative peridural analgesia with opiates].
A case of postoperative myocardial infarction is reported. It occurred seven days after intra-abdominal surgery (left hemicolectomy), in a patient with coronary heart disease. Diagnosis was delayed because of lack of pain; it was suggested by cardiogenic shock occurring 48 h after the initial phase. The patient had been receiving postoperative epidural analgesia with an opioid (pethidine); this may explain the pain was missing, so delaying the diagnosis.