Annales françaises d'anesthèsie et de rèanimation
-
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jan 1990
Review Multicenter Study Clinical Trial[Anesthetics responsible for anaphylactic shock. A French multicenter study].
Combined allergological and anaesthetic consultations have been started in the last few years in eight French Teaching Hospitals so as to explore peranaesthetic anaphylactoid shocks. A survey was carried out in these centers in order to collect patients investigated with the same protocol, for the assessment of the incidence of anaphylaxis in France, as well as the involved drugs. Investigations were always carried out at least 6 to 8 weeks after the accident. ⋯ It would therefore seem mandatory to carry out after any anaphylactoid accident an assessment with sensitive and specific tests for anaphylaxis. Diagnosing anaphylaxis means that the involved drug should be used never again in that patient. Because muscle relaxants are by far the most involved drugs, anaesthetists should use them only when really required.
-
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jan 1990
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Premedication with intranasal midazolam in pediatric anesthesia].
To evaluate nasally administered midazolam 0.2 mg.kg-1 for preinduction of anaesthesia in paediatric patients the authors studied ASA 1 patients scheduled for elective surgery. Forty-five children, ages 3 to 126 months, were randomized in three groups: group D (n = 16) received diazepam 0.33 mg.kg-1 orally, group P (placebo) (n = 13) 0.04 ml.kg-1 normal saline via the nasal route; in group MDZ (n = 16) the children were given intranasal midazolam 0.3 mg.kg-1. The premedication was assessed on a 5-point sedation scale, modified to include the response to mask placement and the quality of the induction of general anaesthesia. ⋯ Vital signs did not change during the study period in any of the three groups. Intranasal midazolam was slightly more effective than oral diazepam. In children, it produces anxiolysis and sedation with rapid onset and is an attractive alternative to other routes for preanaesthetic medication.
-
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jan 1990
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Alkalization of bupivacaine in the combination fentanyl-bupivacaine in epidural obstetrical analgesia].
A randomized double blind study was carried out to determine whether alkalization of a 0.25% bupivacaine solution in a fentanyl-bupivacaine mixture hastened the onset, and increased the duration and quality, of extradural analgesia during labour. The study included 120 women with uncomplicated full-term gestation. Prior to the extradural injection, 0.1 ml of either 8.4% sodium bicarbonate or normal saline was randomly added to 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. ⋯ There were no statistically significant differences between the bicarbonate and control groups with regard to the speed of onset of analgesia (7.08 +/- 0.7 min vs. 6.78 +/- 0.6 min), its duration (123.6 +/- 10.7 min vs. 113 +/- 6.6 min), and the number of cases of inadequate pain relief (6 and 3 respectively). The rate of maternal adverse effects, and neonatal status, were similar in both groups. It can be concluded that alkalizing a 0.25% bupivacaine solution in a fentanyl-bupivacaine mixture for epidural analgesia in labour has no clinical value.
-
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jan 1990
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Intubation in otorhinolaryngologic surgery: propofol versus propofol-suxamethonium].
This study was carried out to assess the conditions of intubation in head and neck surgery when using propofol alone or associated with suxamethonium. Sixty patients were randomly allocated in two groups of 30. Group I was given 3 mg.kg-1 propofol and Group II 3 mg.kg-1 propofol immediately followed by 1.5 mg.kg-1 suxamethonium. ⋯ Opening of the glottis was found to be better in group II than in group I (p less than 0.01) and bucking was more frequent in group I (p less than 0.01). Successful intubation was obtained after one attempt at a similar rate in the two groups. The haemodynamic variations consisted in a significant decrease of systolic blood pressure compared to the initial value but these variations were similar in the two groups at each time (2.3 and 5 min) from induction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)