Resuscitation
-
Review Meta Analysis
Safety of mechanical and manual chest compressions in cardiac arrest patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Summarise the evidence regarding the safety of mechanical and manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest patients. ⋯ The findings suggested that manual compressions could decrease the risk of compression-induced injuries compared to mechanical compressions in cardiac arrest patients. Interestingly, mechanical compressions have not increased the risk of life-threatening injuries, whereas additional high-quality RCTs are needed to further verify the safety of mechanical chest devices.
-
Long-term risks of stroke, atrial fibrillation, or flutter (AF), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and heart failure (HF) among survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are unknown. We aimed to examine 5-year risks of these outcomes among 30-day survivors of OHCA. ⋯ When compared with population controls, OHCA survivors had significantly increased five-year risks of incident stroke, AF, ACS, and HF.
-
Prehospital Termination of Resuscitation (TOR) protocols for adults can reduce the number of futile transports of patients in cardiac arrest, yet similar protocols are not widely available for paediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (POHCA). The objective of this study was to apply a set of criteria for paediatric TOR (pTOR) from the Maryland Institute for Emergency Medical Services Systems (MIEMSS) to a large national cohort and determine its association with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after POHCA. ⋯ The Maryland pTOR criteria identified eligible patients who did not achieve prehospital ROSC, while reliably excluding those who did achieve prehospital ROSC. As most misclassified patients were victims of drowning, we recommend considering the exclusion of drowning patients from future pTOR guidelines. Further studies are needed to evaluate the long-term survival and neurologic outcome of patients misclassified by pTOR criteria.