Resuscitation
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
The technique of endobronchial lidocaine administration does not influence plasma concentration profiles and pharmacokinetic parameters in humans.
This study investigated plasma concentration profiles, pharmacokinetic characteristics and side-effects of lidocaine following 3 different administration techniques. Sixty ASA I/II patients undergoing elective ENT-operations were randomised into 4 groups. Lidocaine 1% (1 mg/kg) was administered 50 min before the end of the operation, via a regular endotracheal tube (group 1), a suction-catheter deep endobronchially (group 2), or an EDGAR-(Endobronchial-Drug and Gas Application during Resuscitation)-tube characterized by a separate injection channel ending at the orifice of the tube (group 3). ⋯ Patients from group 3 were ventilated continuously because of a separate injection channel integrated in the EDGAR-tube. Sore throat was significantly increased in group 2 as compared with groups 1, 3 and 4. Asorption of lidocaine in groups 1-3 resulted in maximal mean plasma concentrations ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 micrograms/ml after 16.9 to 22.4 min.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Early defibrillation by emergency physicians or emergency medical technicians? A controlled, prospective multi-centre study.
In a controlled, prospective multi-centre study, defibrillation by emergency medical technicians (EMTs) was compared with the current standard of care in Germany--defibrillation by emergency physicians (EPs)-in order to answer the following questions: can EMTs in a two-tiered emergency medical services (EMS) system with physicians in the field defibrillate earlier than, and as safely as EPs? Does defibrillation by EMTs (study group) affect survival rate and long-term prognosis of patients in ventricular fibrillation (VF), as compared with the current national standards in resuscitation (basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by EMTs, and defibrillation by physicians: control group? ⋯ In our study, EMT defibrillation was equally effective as defibrillation by EPs, but failed to improve survival rates or long-term outcome of patients in VF significantly, compared to EP defibrillation. Due to a reduction in the time intervals from collapse to defibrillation and to ROSC, as well as in adrenalin doses, by EMT-defibrillation, EMTs in Germany should defibrillate if they reach a patient prior to an EP, provided they have received continuous medical training and supervision.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Catecholamines during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrest.
Serum catecholamines were measured during continued prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation and after 10 mg increments of intravenous epinephrine. This was part of an ongoing trial of 10 mg epinephrine versus placebo. Eight patients were in the placebo arm and seven in the epinephrine arm and the rhythms were two ventricular fibrillation, nine asystole and four electromechanical dissociation. ⋯ It provides data on the other neurotransmitter hormones and supports the relationships shown in other animal and human data. It is suggested that supplementation with epinephrine during CPR may be unnecessary and the levels reached may be deleterious. Nor-adrenaline supplementation may be necessary after prolonged CPR.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
The rapid infusion system: a superior method for the resuscitation of hypovolemic trauma patients.
The rapid infusion system (RIS), which can deliver fluids/blood products rapidly at precise rates and normothermic conditions, was compared with conventional fluid administration (CFA) in a randomized study of 36 hypovolemic trauma patients. Admission stratification criteria of the groups were similar relative to age, Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), Injury Severity Score (ISS) and plasma lactate. Despite the lack of difference in blood loss between the 24-h survivors of the two groups, the CFA group required greater total fluids (23.6/20.21), red blood cells (5.5/4.61), fresh frozen plasma (FFP) (2.8/1.91), platelets (523/204 ml), and crystalloids (12.9/10.61). ⋯ The PTT and PT were related to the degree of lactic acidosis (P = 0.0001) and hypothermia (P = 0.001) but not to the amount of FFP given (P = 0.14). The hospital costs, days in the ICU, and days on the ventilator were greater for the CFA group, as was the incidence of pneumonia (0/11 vs. 6/17; P = 0.03). Hypovolemic trauma patients resuscitated with the RIS needed fewer fluid/blood products and had less coagulopathy; more rapid resolution of hypoperfusion acidosis; better temperature preservation; and fewer hospital complications than those resuscitated with conventional methods of fluid/blood product administration.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Advantages of dextran 70 over Ringer acetate solution in shock treatment and in prevention of adult respiratory distress syndrome. A randomized study in man after traumatic-haemorrhagic shock.
Twenty-three patients aged 20-58 years in a serious state of shock and suffering from major pelvic and femoral fractures sustained in traffic accidents were studied. As initial fluid management, either dextran 70 (1000-1500 ml) together with Ringer's acetate solution (2000-3000 ml), or Ringer's acetate alone (5000-8000 ml), was administered on a random basis. Thus, 12 patients received dextran and 11 patients crystalloid treatment to counteract shock. ⋯ To maintain a stable circulation and a urinary output above 50 ml/h the Ringer patients required significantly more (P less than 0.001) crystalloid solution (910 +/- 300 ml) daily than the dextran patients (460 +/- 400 ml). The frequency of adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was significantly lower (P less than 0.05) in the dextran group (0 of 12) than in the Ringer group (4 of 11). Thus, in the initial treatment of traumatic-haemorrhagic shock and in the post-resuscitative period dextran 70 would seem of advantage over Ringer's acetate both in shortening the shock period and in reducing the frequency of adult respiratory distress syndrome.