Patient education and counseling
-
Comparative Study
A comparison of videotape and audiotape assessment of patient-centredness in family physicians' consultations.
The aim of this study was to compare videotape and audiotape assessments of doctors' patient-centred behaviour in primary care consultations. The patient-centredness scale of Henbest and Stewart was used to measure the quality of 856 doctor-patient interactions in 258 consultations performed by 47 primary care physicians recorded on videotape. Assessments were performed once using only the sound track and a second time using both the sound and video-tracks. ⋯ Little information (<5%) was lost when using audiotape compared to videotape. It was technically easier to assess the video recordings. Audio recording is equivalent to video recording for the assessment of patient-centredness using the scale of Henbest and Stewart in primary care consultations.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Learning to have less pain - is it possible? A one-year follow-up study of the effects of a personal construct group learning programme on patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.
A randomised controlled study with the objective to explore the effects of a group learning programme based on a phenomenological epistemology and personal construct theory. Main outcome measures were: experienced pain, pain coping strategies, absenteeism, disability pension and health care consumption. One hundred and twenty-one patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and high absenteeism were included in this study. ⋯ One year after the end of the learning programme (T3), patients in the intervention group reported significant pain reduction, increased pain-coping abilities and a higher reduction of health care consumption than the control group (P<0.05). Absenteeism was not significantly reduced compared to the control group, but there were fewer persons receiving disability pension in the intervention group at T3 (38 versus 59%) (P<0.05). This group-learning programme should be considered an important adjunct to the therapy of patients with chronic muscular pain.
-
The purpose of this study was to determine how people weigh both median survival time and 1-year survival probability when considering a choice between palliative Cisplatin-based chemotherapy with best supportive care (C+BSC) versus best supportive care alone (BSC) as treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Sixty people, previously treated for cancer, were interviewed as surrogate patients making a treatment decision. The interview included a structured description of the treatment options, and trade-off exercises used to clarify the participants' attitudes pertaining to the survival probabilities associated with each treatment. ⋯ All but one participant recommended the interview as a decision-support strategy for actual patients. The findings suggest that patients with advanced NSCLC should be offered more than one treatment option, and that a systematic process for educating patients and for eliciting their preferences is desirable. The process described herein has potential for use in this clinical setting.