The International journal of health planning and management
-
Int J Health Plann Manage · Oct 2011
What should the government do regarding health policy-making to develop community health care in Shanghai?
The traditional three-stratum healthcare system, within which municipal, district and community hospitals all paid great attention to improving medical treatment service by developing medical technology, is no longer able to meet the current health needs in Shanghai. In 1997, the Chinese government called for the development of community health services to serve as a basic platform to provide public health service and basic medical cure. However, because the market-oriented economic reform was based on a fee-for-service mechanism (without a strict monitoring system), most community health centers (CHCs) still put great effort into developing medical services geared to profit, rather than to provide proper medical service for all and a "quality" public health service. To try to solve the problem, some government-controlled payment (GCP) system has been implemented in CHCs gradually in districts of Shanghai. The study intended to evaluate the impact of GCP solutions already implemented, as well as the impact of the standardized GCP system with supplementary solutions, in enabling CHCs to focus on providing quality public health services and appropriate medical treatment, rather than focusing on profit and loss, in order to meet the health needs aroused by major socioeconomic transition in Shanghai. ⋯ Although there have been other policies interacting with the impact of GCP, GCP reforms implemented in the pilot districts at different times (as well as the later, standardized GCP system) have been effective in enabling CHCs to focus on providing quality public health services and appropriate medical treatment, rather than concentrating upon profit and loss. The impact of the standardized GCP system was further confirmed by cross-sectional comparisons of some broad indicators, in terms of medical cost, quality of medical service, and coverage of public health service, between the pilot districts and control districts. However, uncertainties exit when looking at individual indicators. Some indicators (see pp. 11-13 and Table 5), such as the service contracting rate with CHCs and the proportion of residents with health records set up, were not sufficient to allow for reasonable estimation of the impact of the GCP. In part this was due to inconsistent data collections. Some indicators, on the other hand, such as the standard management rate of residents with hypertension, were usually affected by the changing government's role over the period. Meanwhile, variations among the three pilot districts with different socioeconomic profiles were observed by several individual indicators within the evaluation index. Further research is needed to investigate the impact of other solutions--such as user fee removal and "zero margin profit" of medicine in CHCs--in order to coordinate other policies with the GCP to improve CHCs more effectively. Longer term observation of impact of the standardized GCP system, as well as other influencing factors in Shanghai based on quality data collected on a standard basis, may help improve policy. Moreover, variations in residents' expectations of barriers in access to CHC services and in healthcare-seeking behavior need to be taken into consideration when designing GCP systems for areas with different socioeconomic profiles in order to meet the different health needs which are a consequence of the major socioeconomic changes in Shanghai (and China in general, it could be agreed).
-
Int J Health Plann Manage · Oct 2011
Serve the people or close the sale? Profit-driven overuse of injections and infusions in China's market-based healthcare system.
Treatment by injection or infusion is widespread in China. Using the common cold as a tracer condition, we explored the reasons for over-prescription of injections and infusions in Guizhou, China. Interviews with prescribers, patients and key informants were supplemented by focus groups. ⋯ Market-based reforms have attempted to control costs and increase productivity with an incentive scheme which rewards prescribers financially for over-prescription in general and for use of injections and infusions in particular. Aggressive marketing has displaced oral treatment from health facilities into independent pharmacies, leaving doctors functioning mainly as injection providers. There is a need for a multi-faceted response encompassing education and reform of financial incentives to reduce the use of unnecessary treatment.
-
Health insurance programs have changed rapidly over time in China. Among rural populations, insurance coverage shifted from nearly universal levels in the 1970s to 7% in 1999; it stands at 94% of counties in 2009. This large increase is the result of a series of health reforms that aim to achieve universal access to healthcare and better risk protection, largely through the rollout of the health insurance programs and the gradual increase in subsidies and benefits over time. ⋯ We discuss some of the problems with the rural and urban residents' schemes including reliance on local government capacity, reimbursement ceilings and rates, and incentives for unnecessary care and waste in the design of the programs. Recommendations include increasing financial support and deepening the benefits packages. Strategies to control cost and improve quality include developing mixed provider payment mechanisms, implementing essential medicines policies and strengthening the quality of primary-care provision.