Journal of pain and symptom management
-
J Pain Symptom Manage · Aug 1995
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialA revised measure of acute pain in infants.
Acute pain in infants is not assessed or managed optimally. The objectives of the study were (a) to adapt a behavioral pain assessment measure (Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale, CHEOPS) for use with infants, and (b) to establish the reliability and validity of the measure in a study of infants undergoing immunization. Ninety-six healthy 4- to 6-month-old infants were randomized to receive either the local anesthetic cream Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthetics (EMLA) (N = 49), or a placebo (N = 47) prior to immunization. ⋯ Agreement between raters' scores was high (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.95). Results from this study suggest that this measure has beginning construct and concurrent validity and interrater reliability when used in a research study. Further testing of the measure in the clinical setting is required.
-
J Pain Symptom Manage · May 1995
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe morphine-sparing effect of propacetamol in orthopedic postoperative pain.
The analgesic efficacy and safety of propacetamol (Pro-Dafalgan), an injectable prodrug of acetaminophen, in combination with morphine administered by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) were studied in 60 patients (56 men, 4 women; age 18-40 years; mean age, 26 years) after knee ligamentoplasty. Using a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group design, the effects of four (every 6 hr) intravenous injections of 2 g propacetamol (= 1 g acetaminophen) were compared with four injections of placebo (PL) in the recovery room immediately after surgery. Efficacy was assessed over 24 hr by automatic recording on the PCA device of the cumulative dose of morphine and the number of boluses requested. ⋯ A five-point global efficacy scale was also administered. Any side effects were recorded throughout the duration of the study, and the ability to tolerate the drug was assessed by recording arterial pressure, cardiac and respiratory frequency, and sedation at the same assessment times as the pain scores. The 24-hr morphine consumption was significantly decreased in the propacetamol group (number of 1 mg boluses: 14.7 +/- 11.3 versus 23.2 +/- 13.8, P = 0.01; PCA usage: 26.4 +/- 12.3 mg versus 34.6 +/- 15.4 mg, P = 0.03; PCA usage + titration: 34.5 +/- 12.7 mg versus 43.1 +/- 15.9 mg, P = 0.02).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
J Pain Symptom Manage · Apr 1995
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialBuffered lidocaine for skin infiltration prior to hemodialysis.
This study compared the effects of buffered versus unbuffered lidocaine when used as local anesthetic in preparation for cannulation of the arterial and venous sites of children requiring hemodialysis. The subjects for this study were seven children, ages 6-18 years, observed during 101 dialysis treatments. For each subject undergoing hemodialysis on a given day, one syringe containing 1% lidocaine (L) and one containing buffered lidocaine (BL) were prepared. ⋯ Speed of injection was not controlled. Comparisons of self-reported pain and behavioral observations for L versus BL revealed no significant differences for pain of infiltration or pain of cannulation. Technique variables such as the speed of injection, which tended to be very slow for these children, appear to significantly influence infiltration pain and the relative merits of buffering.
-
J Pain Symptom Manage · Jan 1995
Review Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialIntravenous regional sympathetic blockade for pain relief in reflex sympathetic dystrophy: a systematic review and a randomized, double-blind crossover study.
The first aim was a systematic review of intravenous regional sympathetic blocks (IRSBs) in patients with reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of IRSBs in patients with RSD were identified by MEDLINE search (1966 to May 1993) and by hand search of 30 journals (1950 to May 1993). Authors of eligible trials were asked for information on additional trials and for unpublished data. ⋯ Sixteen patients with diagnosis of RSD were recruited, but only nine entered the double-blind phase. The trial was stopped prematurely because of the severity of the adverse effects. No significant difference was found between guanethidine and placebo on any of the outcome measures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
J Pain Symptom Manage · Aug 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe dose-response relationship of controlled-release codeine (Codeine Contin) in chronic cancer pain.
The improved pain control provided by regular dosing of opioid analgesics in patients with severe cancer pain has been well established. However, the treatment of mild-to-moderate cancer pain is often limited to "as needed" dosing with fixed combinations of codeine or oxycodone plus a nonopioid analgesic, which do not allow optimal titration of the individual components. This randomized double-blind study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of controlled-release codeine (Codeine Contin) in patients with cancer pain, and to estimate its dose equivalence to a standard combination of acetaminophen plus codeine. ⋯ The sum of pain intensity differences (SPID) from baseline and the total pain relief (TOTPAR) scores demonstrated a dose-response relationship for Codeine Contin on days 1 and 4 that was statistically significant on day 1 and suggested greater analgesic efficacy on day 4, compared with day 1. Codeine Contin 150 mg every 12 hr was estimated to be equianalgesic to acetaminophen plus codeine (600 mg/60 mg) given every 6 hr. Because a similar equivalence was also demonstrated from analysis of adverse event data, it is concluded that Codeine Contin 150 mg produces analgesia and a side-effect profile similar to a 40% lower dose of codeine provided by the combination.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)