Current medical research and opinion
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study
Patient-reported outcomes from a randomized, crossover trial comparing a pen injector with insulin degludec versus a pen injector with insulin glargine U100 in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Objective: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with insulin resistance and deteriorated glycemic control that can be restored with insulin injections. Choice of insulin pen injector may affect complexity, adherence, efficacy of treatment and health-related quality of life. We describe detailed patient-reported outcomes (PROs) on treatment impact and preference comparing insulin degludec (degludec) using FlexTouch1 versus insulin glargine U100 (glargine U100) with SoloStar2 pen injector. ⋯ Significantly more were "not at all bothered" by device discomfort (74.3 vs. 54.1%), whereas device size (83.8 vs. 80.0%) or public use (69.9 vs. 60.7%) were numerically in favor of FlexTouch. Significantly more patients preferred degludec treatment with FlexTouch (59 vs. 22%), preferred to continue (67 vs. 15%) and recommend (67 vs. 14%) use of FlexTouch compared with SoloStar with glargine U100. Conclusions: In this randomized, crossover trial, lower treatment impact and higher patient preference were reported for FlexTouch versus SoloStar pen injectors.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
Relationship of obesity to adverse events in myocardial infarction patients without primary percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the Occluded Artery Trial (OAT).
Objective: Our goal was to investigate the "obesity paradox" in myocardial infarction populations without primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Methods: The Occluded Artery Trial (OAT, Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00004562) is a randomized, multicenter study to investigate the influence of routine percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on the clinical outcomes of myocardial infarction patients without PPCI. We stratified these patients into three groups according to body mass index (BMI): normal, 18.5 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 25 kg/m2; overweight, 25 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 30 kg/m2; obese, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. ⋯ We did not find any statistical differences among BMI categories in terms of cardiac death or NYHA class IV heart failure. Conclusions: A U-shaped relationship was observed between BMI and all-cause mortality or non-cardiac death. Overweight patients have the lowest risk of all-cause mortality, which may be attributed to their having the lowest risk of non-cardiac death of the groups studied.