Current medical research and opinion
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Assessment of potentially abuse-related events in two phase 3 studies of NKTR-181, a novel opioid analgesic, using the MADDERS® system (Misuse, Abuse, and Diversion Drug Event Reporting System).
Objective: To prospectively evaluate the abuse potential of NKTR-181, a novel opioid analgesic, in two phase 3 clinical trials using a newly developed reporting system: the Misuse, Abuse, and Diversion Drug Event Reporting System (MADDERS®). Methods: SUMMIT-07 was an enriched enrollment randomized withdrawal study that examined the safety and efficacy of NKTR-181 across 12 weeks in opioid-naïve subjects with chronic low back pain. SUMMIT-LTS was a 52 week open-label study in opioid-naïve and experienced subjects with chronic low back pain or noncancer pain rolled over from SUMMIT-07 or enrolled de novo. ⋯ Most events were attributed to "Withdrawal" and, primarily in SUMMIT-07, "Therapeutic Error" (unintentional overuse) or "Misuse" (intentional overuse for a therapeutic purpose) of study medication. Adjudicators identified five possible "Abuse" events (three NKTR-181, two placebo) in SUMMIT-07 and four possible "Abuse" events (all NKTR-181) in SUMMIT-LTS. Conclusions: The MADDERS® system discerns potentially abuse-related events and identified low rates of withdrawal and a low risk of abuse potential, diversion or addiction associated with NKTR-181 in phase 3 trials.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cost-utility analysis of reslizumab for patients with severe eosinophilic asthma inadequately controlled with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists in South Korea.
Objectives: We aimed to assess the cost-utility of reslizumab for patients with severe eosinophilic asthma uncontrolled with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists (ICS/LABAs) in Korea. Methods: A Markov model with limited societal perspective was used to compare the costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of reslizumab add-on therapy with standard-of-care (high-dose ICS/LABA) and standard-of-care alone. The model adopted a 4 week cycle with the following six health states over a lifetime (60 years): controlled asthma, uncontrolled asthma, moderate exacerbation, severe exacerbation, all-cause death and asthma-related death. ⋯ Conclusions: The addition of reslizumab to high-dose ICS/LABA was cost-effective in Korean patients with severe eosinophilic asthma uncontrolled with high-dose ICS/LABA, based on the threshold of 1 gross domestic product in Korea. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01285323. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01287039.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study
Patient-reported outcomes from a randomized, crossover trial comparing a pen injector with insulin degludec versus a pen injector with insulin glargine U100 in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Objective: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with insulin resistance and deteriorated glycemic control that can be restored with insulin injections. Choice of insulin pen injector may affect complexity, adherence, efficacy of treatment and health-related quality of life. We describe detailed patient-reported outcomes (PROs) on treatment impact and preference comparing insulin degludec (degludec) using FlexTouch1 versus insulin glargine U100 (glargine U100) with SoloStar2 pen injector. ⋯ Significantly more were "not at all bothered" by device discomfort (74.3 vs. 54.1%), whereas device size (83.8 vs. 80.0%) or public use (69.9 vs. 60.7%) were numerically in favor of FlexTouch. Significantly more patients preferred degludec treatment with FlexTouch (59 vs. 22%), preferred to continue (67 vs. 15%) and recommend (67 vs. 14%) use of FlexTouch compared with SoloStar with glargine U100. Conclusions: In this randomized, crossover trial, lower treatment impact and higher patient preference were reported for FlexTouch versus SoloStar pen injectors.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
Relationship of obesity to adverse events in myocardial infarction patients without primary percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the Occluded Artery Trial (OAT).
Objective: Our goal was to investigate the "obesity paradox" in myocardial infarction populations without primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Methods: The Occluded Artery Trial (OAT, Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00004562) is a randomized, multicenter study to investigate the influence of routine percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on the clinical outcomes of myocardial infarction patients without PPCI. We stratified these patients into three groups according to body mass index (BMI): normal, 18.5 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 25 kg/m2; overweight, 25 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 30 kg/m2; obese, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. ⋯ We did not find any statistical differences among BMI categories in terms of cardiac death or NYHA class IV heart failure. Conclusions: A U-shaped relationship was observed between BMI and all-cause mortality or non-cardiac death. Overweight patients have the lowest risk of all-cause mortality, which may be attributed to their having the lowest risk of non-cardiac death of the groups studied.