Journal of clinical anesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Effects of intravenous lidocaine and/or esmolol on hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation: a double-blind, controlled clinical trial.
To evaluate the efficacy of intravenous lidocaine and two doses of esmolol for attenuating the cardiovascular responses to laryngoscopy and intubation, and to assess whether a combination of both drugs is more effective than either drug alone. ⋯ Esmolol 1 to 2 mg/kg is reliably effective in attenuating HR response to tracheal intubation. Neither of the two doses of esmolol tested nor that of lidocaine affected the BP response. Only the combination of lidocaine and esmolol attenuated both HR and BP responses to tracheal intubation.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Propofol at conscious sedation doses produces mild analgesia to cold pressor-induced pain in healthy volunteers.
To determine whether subanesthetic doses of propofol have analgesic effects in healthy volunteers. ⋯ Our laboratory results are consistent with the commonly accepted clinical practice of supplementing propofol with an opioid in conscious sedation procedures to provide a satisfactory level of pain relief.
-
Review Comparative Study
Effects of regional anesthesia on perioperative outcome.
To provide an overview of current knowledge, this article reviews experimental and clinical data from investigations examining effects of regional anesthesia on perioperative morbidity in specific physiologic systems. The issues of morbidity and mortality following general and regional anesthesia are addressed, as are the development of perioperative thromboembolism and blood loss, which are known to be increased during general anesthesia. Finally, the effects of regional anesthesia on the vascular system, the perioperative stress response, and the pulmonary function are discussed.
-
We present a rare case of coronary artery spasm during spinal anesthesia in a patient who had neither complications nor prior history of coronary artery disease. Some factors are involved in the occurrence of perioperative coronary artery spasm. ⋯ Although spinal anesthesia by itself has not been reported to be a cause of coronary artery spasm, it is likely, in the current case, that the combination of the activated parasympathetic nerve system by the retraction of the peritoneum and spinal anesthesia might have caused the coronary artery spasm. Anesthesiologists need to be aware that coronary artery spasm may occur during spinal anesthesia, especially when the peritoneum is retracted.