Journal of clinical anesthesia
-
The anesthetic of a patient who presented for vascular access under axillary block is described. After physical examination and ultrasound study, the patient was found to have a bifid axillary artery. Because of neurologic anomalies associated with this vascular variation, an interscalene block was chosen for the procedure. The clinical implications of a bifid axillary artery when an axillary block is contemplated are discussed.
-
To conduct a retrospective analysis of incident reports concerning dental injury, the most common cause for litigation against anesthesiologists, to determine specific risk factors that will help in formulating a risk reduction strategy for this clinical problem. ⋯ In elective intubation, the teeth most likely to be injured are the upper incisors, in patients aged 50-70 years. In most cases dental injury is not associated with a pre-event prediction of difficult intubation.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A prospective, randomized, double-blinded comparison of ropivacaine 0.5%, 0.75%, and 1% ropivacaine for peribulbar block.
To evaluate the efficacy of three different concentrations of ropivacaine (0.5%, 0.75%, and 1%) together with a single concentration of hyaluronidase administered for peribulbar block. ⋯ While confirming that ropivacaine is a good option for peribulbar anesthesia, this study demonstrated that the use of 0.75% or 1% concentrations are preferred in that they produce quick and deep sensory and motor block of the operated eye. If recovery of normal motor function is important after surgery, the 0.75% concentration probably represents the best compromise.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube for outpatient surgery: analysis of anesthesia-controlled time.
To show that efficiency of operating room times can be improved significantly using rapid changes between operative procedures. ⋯ The clinical relevance of reduced anesthesia induction time using LMA is questionable. The lack of difference in emergence time could be a result of the use of total intravenous anesthesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Preoperative intravenous midazolam: benefits beyond anxiolysis.
To evaluate the effect of midazolam on the global perioperative experience, including patient satisfaction, postoperative nausea and vomiting, postoperative pain, and perioperative anxiety and amnesia. ⋯ In addition to the known anxiolytic effects of midazolam, midazolam premedication is an effective way to reduce the frequency of postoperative nausea, and perhaps vomiting, and increase patient satisfaction.