Journal of clinical anesthesia
-
Review Meta Analysis
Individualized PEEP guided by EIT in patients undergoing general anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
The determination of optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) values in patients undergoing general anesthesia remains controversial. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) directed individualized PEEP has emerged as a novel approach to PEEP setting and has garnered increasing attention. This meta-analysis aims to systematically assess the effect of EIT-guided PEEP setting compared to traditional fixed PEEP values or other PEEP titration strategies in patients undergoing general anesthesia. ⋯ Our meta-analysis suggests potential benefits of EIT-guided individualized PEEP setting in improving intraoperative oxygenation and lung compliance in patients undergoing general anesthesia. However, further research is needed to establish conclusive evidence, and caution should be exercised in interpreting these findings as the current literature remains inconclusive regarding the impact on intraoperative hemodynamics and postoperative complications.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Relationship between perioperative anaphylaxis and history of allergies or allergic diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression.
We conducted this meta-analysis to summarize the available evidence and evaluate the relationship between a history of allergies/allergic diseases and perioperative anaphylaxis to offer preventive decision support. ⋯ Patients with previous drug allergies, food allergies, a history of allergies, or atopy are more likely to develop anaphylaxis during the perioperative period. Additional studies should be carried out to determine whether a history of allergies/allergic diseases is a major factor for perioperative anaphylaxis when confounders are controlled.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Efficacy and safety of Ciprofol compared with Propofol during general anesthesia induction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT).
Ciprofol, a newer entrant with similarities to propofol, has shown promise with a potentially improved safety profile, making it an attractive alternative for induction of general anesthesia. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of ciprofol compared with propofol during general anesthesia induction. ⋯ Propofol, frequently utilized as an anesthetic, provides swift onset and quick recovery. However, it has drawbacks such as a narrow effective dosage range and a high occurrence of adverse effects, particularly pain upon injection. Ciprofol, a more recent drug with propofol-like properties, has demonstrated promise and may have an improved safety profile, making it a compelling alternative for inducing general anesthesia. This meta-analysis compared the safety and effectiveness of Ciprofol with Propofol for general anesthesia induction in a range of medical procedures, encompassing thirteen Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and 1998 individuals. The pooled analysis indicated that Ciprofol was associated with a notably lower incidence of pain upon injection [RR: 0.15; 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.23; I^2 = 43%, p < 0.0000001] and was non-inferior to propofol in terms of anesthesia success rate [RR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.01; I^2 = 0%; p = 0.43]. In terms of safety, the incidence of hypotension was significantly lower in the ciprofol group [RR:0.82; 95% CI:0.68 to 0.98; I^2 = 48%; p = 0.03]. However, no statistically significant differences were found for hypertension, bradycardia, or tachycardia. In conclusion, ciprofol is equally effective at inducing and maintaining general anesthesia as propofol. When compared to propofol, ciprofol is a better alternative sedative for operations including fiberoptic bronchoscopy, gynecological procedures, gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures, and elective surgeries because it has less adverse effects, most notably less painful injections.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Kidney disease in trials of perioperative tranexamic acid.
To assess how kidney disease is handled in randomized trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of perioperative tranexamic acid, and to evaluate its effects across levels of kidney function. ⋯ The large evidence base supporting perioperative tranexamic acid suffers from broad and unjustified exclusion of patients with kidney disease. Typical perioperative dosing of tranexamic acid is likely safe and effective in patients with creatinine clearance >30 mL/min, but effects in more severe kidney disease are unknown.
-
Observational Study
Transfusion targets and adverse events in pediatric perioperative acute Anemia.
To evaluate the association between pretransfusion and posttransfusion hemoglobin concentrations and the outcomes of children undergoing noncardiac surgery. ⋯ In transfused patients, there was no association between postoperative hemoglobin values and clinical outcomes, except the need for subsequent transfusion. Most transfused patients presented to the operating room with anemia, which suggests a potential opportunity for perioperative optimization of health before surgery.