NeuroImage
-
Review Historical Article
The future of susceptibility contrast for assessment of anatomy and function.
The magnetic properties of tissues affect MR images and differences in magnetic susceptibility can be utilized to provide impressive image contrast. Specifically, phase images acquired with gradient echo MRI provide unique and superb contrast which reflects variations in the underlying tissue composition. ⋯ Still, this major tissue contrast mechanism is largely unexplored in magnetic resonance imaging because non-conventional reconstruction and dipole deconvolution are required to quantitatively map tissue susceptibility properly. This short review summarizes the current state of susceptibility contrast and susceptibility mapping and aims to identify future directions.
-
T2*-weighted Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) requires efficient acquisition methods in order to fully sample the brain in a several second time period. The most widely used approach is Echo Planar Imaging (EPI), which utilizes a Cartesian trajectory to cover k-space. This trajectory is subject to ghosts from off-resonance and gradient imperfections and is intrinsically sensitive to cardiac-induced pulsatile motion from substantial first- and higher order moments of the gradient waveform near the k-space origin. ⋯ Spiral methods have reduced sensitivity to motion, shorter readout times, improved signal recovery in most frontal and parietal brain regions, and exhibit blurring artifacts instead of ghosts or geometric distortion. Methods combining spiral-in and spiral-out trajectories have further advantages in terms of diminished susceptibility-induced signal dropout and increased BOLD signal. In measurements of temporal signal to noise ratio measured in 8 subjects, spiral-in/out exhibited significant increases over EPI in voxel volumes recovered in frontal and whole brain regions (18% and 10%, respectively).
-
In the last 20 years or so, functional MRI has matured very rapidly from being an experimental imaging method in the hands of a few labs to being a very widely available and widely used workhorse of cognitive neuroscience and clinical neuroscience research internationally. FMRI studies have had a considerable impact on our understanding of brain system phenotypes of neurological and psychiatric disorders; and some impact already on development of new therapeutics. However, the direct benefit of fMRI to individual patients with brain disorders has so far been minimal. Here I provide a personal perspective on what has already been achieved, and imagine how the further development of fMRI over the medium term might lead to even greater engagement with clinical medicine.
-
Review Historical Article
Intracortical recordings and fMRI: an attempt to study operational modules and networks simultaneously.
The brain can be envisaged as a complex adaptive system. It is characterized by a very high structural complexity and by massive connectivity, both of which change and evolve in response to experience. Information related to sensors and effectors is processed in both a parallel and a hierarchical fashion; the connectivity between different hierarchical levels is bidirectional, and its effectiveness is continuously controlled by specific associational and neuromodulatory centers. ⋯ In other words, multimodal methodologies that include invasive neuroscientific methods as well as global neuroimaging techniques are required, such as the various functional aspects of magnetic resonance imaging. These facts were the driving force behind the decision to begin animal-MRI in my lab. The wonderful idea of the editors of NeuroImage to publish a Special Issue commemorating 20years of functional fMRI provides me with the opportunity of sharing not only our first moments of frustration with the readers, but also our successful results.
-
High-resolution magnetic resonance phase- or frequency-shift images acquired at high field show contrast related to magnetic susceptibility differences between tissues. Such contrast varies with the orientation of the organ in the field, but the development of quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) has made it possible to reproducibly image the intrinsic tissue susceptibility contrast. However, recent studies indicate that magnetic susceptibility is anisotropic in brain white matter and, as such, needs to be described by a symmetric second-rank tensor( ̅χ). ⋯ The MMS and MSA were quantified for regions in several large white matter fiber structures, including the corona radiata, posterior thalamic radiation and corpus callosum. MMS ranged from -0.037 to -0.053 ppm (referenced to CSF being about zero). MSA values could be quantified without the need for a reference and ranged between 0.004 and 0.029 ppm, in line with the expectation that the susceptibility perpendicular to the fiber is more diamagnetic than the one parallel to it.