The Knee
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
A prospective, randomised study comparing two techniques of autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects in the knee: Periosteum covered versus type I/III collagen covered.
The results for autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) in the treatment of full thickness chondral defects in the knee are encouraging. At present two techniques have been described to retain the chondrocyte suspension within the defect. The first involves using a periosteal cover (ACI-P) and the second involves using a type I/III collagen membrane (ACI-C). To the authors knowledge there are no comparative studies of these two techniques in the current literature. We have therefore undertaken such a study to establish if there is a difference between the 2 techniques based on a clinical and arthroscopic assessment. ⋯ This study has shown no statistical difference between the clinical outcome of ACI-C versus ACI-P at 2 years. A significant number of patients who had the ACI-P required shaving of a hypertrophied graft. We conclude that there is no advantage in using periosteum as a cover for retaining chondrocytes within an osteochondral defect; as a result we advocate the use of an alternative cover such as a manufactured type I/III collagen membrane.
-
To determine if the functional outcome of total knee replacement (TKR) was affected by the level of preoperative symptom severity, the association between preoperative Oxford Knee Scores (OKS), and 2 year OKS, American Knee Society clinical and function scores (AKSS) was assessed. Data were prospectively collected on 45 cases who had single joint osteoarthritis and no other comorbidities. We have specifically focused on patients with single knee involvement to remove the effect of multiple joint involvement and comorbidities on the OKS. ⋯ Rather than all patients achieving uniform results post-TKR, patients with more severe symptoms achieved poorer absolute outcomes. The Spearman correlation coefficient between pre- and postoperative OKS was r = 0.4 (p = 0.006). Although the results suggest that waiting too long before intervention compromises the final outcome, a correlation of 0.4 is not strong enough to necessitate change in current practice.