Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis
-
J. Thromb. Thrombolysis · Apr 2016
Review Meta Analysis Comparative StudyComparison of the Wells score with the revised Geneva score for assessing suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
The Wells score and the revised Geneva score are two most commonly used clinical rules for excluding pulmonary embolism (PE). In this study, we aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of these two rules; we also compared the diagnostic accuracy between them. We searched PubMed and Web of science up to April 2015. ⋯ Meta-regression showed diagnostic accuracy of these two rules was not related with PE prevalence. Sensitivity analysis by only included prospective studies showed the results were robust. Our results showed the Wells score was more effective than the revised Geneva score in discriminate PE in suspected patients.
-
J. Thromb. Thrombolysis · Apr 2016
Impact of microparticles derived from erythrocytes on fibrinolysis.
It has long been known that negatively charged membranes of erythrocyte-derived microparticles display procoagulant activity. However, relatively little is known about the possible fibrinolytic activity of such microparticles. This issue becomes particularly important during red blood cell storage, which significantly increases the number of microparticles. ⋯ Microparticles present fibrinolytic activity mainly due to the presence of plasminogen on them. Microparticles derived from erythrocytes significantly enhance cleavage of the chromogenic substrate by the streptokinase-plasminogen complex, but to a lesser extent accelerate euglobulin clot lysis time. Erythrocyte-derived microparticles display prominent fibrinolytic activity, which significantly decreases during storage of red blood cells.
-
J. Thromb. Thrombolysis · Feb 2016
ReviewDecision-making about the use of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant therapies for patients with atrial fibrillation.
Until recently, vitamin K antagonists, warfarin being the most commonly used agent in the United States, have been the only oral anticoagulant therapies available to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). In the last 5 years four new, non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants, the so-called NOACs or novel oral anticoagulants, have come to market and been approved by the Federal Drug Administration. Despite comparable if not superior efficacy in preventing AF-related stroke, and generally lower risks of major hemorrhage, particularly intracranial bleeding, the uptake of these agents has been slow. ⋯ Three reversal agents, idarucizumab, andexanet alfa, and aripazine, have already progressed to human studies and show great promise as either antidotes for specific drugs or as universal reversal agents. The availability of these reversal agents will likely increase the clinical use of the non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants. In light of the many complex and nuanced issues surrounding the choice of an optimal anticoagulant for any AF patient, a patient-centered/shared decision-making approach will be useful.
-
J. Thromb. Thrombolysis · Feb 2016
ReviewWhy develop antidotes and reversal agents for non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants?
Over the past several years, non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been introduced into clinical practice for the treatment of venous thromboembolism and prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Clinical trials have shown these agents to have similar or less risk of major bleeding as compared to warfarin therapy. ⋯ However, there are situations where urgent reversal of NOAC anticoagulation would be desirable. The following review focuses on the outcomes and management strategies for patients experiencing a major bleed with warfarin or NOAC agents and describes the rationale for the development of therapies capable of targeted NOAC-reversal.
-
J. Thromb. Thrombolysis · Feb 2016
Clinical TrialStandardized use of novel oral anticoagulants plasma level thresholds in a new thrombolysis decision making protocol.
Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients receiving non-vitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) are commonly excluded from thrombolytic therapy, as interpretation of coagulation tests remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the applicability of a novel institutional protocol for thrombolysis based on current expert recommendations and NOAC specific coagulation assessment. We included hospitalized AIS patients receiving NOAC for at least 24 h and consecutive AIS patients not receiving NOAC into a prospective study. ⋯ In patients receiving rivaroxaban, trough level (68.0 ng/ml, IQR 64.0) was below our predefined upper thresholds that would allow thrombolysis in 4/5 patients. In all patients on apixaban, trough level was above our predefined threshold of 40 ng/ml that precludes thrombolysis (98.2 ng/ml, IQR 84.3). Predefined thresholds of NOAC plasma levels in the decision of thrombolysis in NOAC treated AIS patients might supplement routine coagulation tests and should be validated in a larger study population.