Current opinion in critical care
-
The article provides an overview of efforts to identify and validate biomarkers in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and a discussion of the challenges confronting researchers in this area. ⋯ This article summarizes the current status of ARDS biomarker research and provides a framework for future investigation.
-
Curr Opin Crit Care · Feb 2014
ReviewExtracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.
To examine the role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as potential therapeutic option for severe cases of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). ⋯ Guidelines from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization still indicate ECMO for acute severe pulmonary failure potentially reversible and unresponsive to conventional management. The new definition of ARDS (Berlin definition) addresses clinicians to the best treatment options in respect of the severity of illness and allocates ECMO as a potential therapeutic option for patients with severe ARDS and a P/F ratio lower than 100 and proposed that the indication of ECMO may be shifted from the treatment of choice for refractory hypoxemia to the treatment of choice to minimize ventilator-induced lung injury.
-
Curr Opin Crit Care · Feb 2014
ReviewThe acute respiratory distress syndrome: incidence and mortality, has it changed?
The purpose of this review is to examine and discuss the incidence and outcome of patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This is a challenging task, as there is no specific clinical sign or diagnostic test that accurately identifies and adequately defines this syndrome. ⋯ On the basis of current evidence, and despite the order of magnitude of reported European and USA incidence figures, it seems that the incidence and overall mortality of ARDS has not changed substantially since the original ARDSnet study. The current mortality of adult ARDS is still greater than 40%.
-
Prone position can prevent ventilator-induced lung injury in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients receiving conventional mechanical ventilation and, hence, may have the potential to improve survival from this basis. Even though no single randomized controlled trial has proven benefit on patient outcome until recently, two meta-analyses, one on grouped data and the other on individual data, have shown that patients with PaO2/FIO2 ratio less than 100 mmHg at the time of inclusion did benefit from prone position. As a fifth trial completed recently has shown a significant reduction in mortality in patients with severe and confirmed ARDS from using prone position, the purpose of this review is to revisit prone positioning in ARDS in the light of these new findings. ⋯ From the combined results of the two meta-analyses and the last randomized controlled trial, there is a very strong signal to use prone position in patients with severe ARDS, as early as possible and for long sessions.
-
Fluid resuscitation in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is not well documented. Clinical evidence comes from studies in critically ill patients, but these patients respond differently to fluids depending on the presence or absence of sepsis. ⋯ In order to evaluate the pros and cons of using fluids in ARDS patients, it is important to carefully analyze the latest trials. Recent studies have emphasized the importance of better understanding endothelial pathophysiology during fluid management in ARDS patients. Certainly, further studies analyzing fluid strategies in septic and nonseptic ARDS patients are needed.