Current opinion in critical care
-
Curr Opin Crit Care · Dec 2010
ReviewHuman factors in critical care: towards standardized integrated human-centred systems of work.
Improvements in safety and quality benefit from a systems approach. Human factors is the study and practice of the relationship between humans and systems. This review examines recent advances in human factors in healthcare. ⋯ The human factors approach is not yet mature in healthcare, but the importance is being increasingly recognized, and the breadth of application continually expanded.
-
The management of patients with pelvic fractures can be demanding. Severe pelvic fractures pose a great challenge for physicians and can greatly contribute to significant patient morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this review is to highlight recent, positive changes in the management of patients with pelvic fractures. ⋯ The key elements in managing patients with pelvic fractures are swift and adequate resuscitation, reversal of shock and acidosis, and rapid control of hemorrhage to facilitate survival of these patients. Multimodality therapies including external pelvic stabilization, angioembolization and preperitoneal pelvic packing are useful adjuncts that require appropriately trained and immediately available personnel. A multidisciplinary approach has been shown to be beneficial for patient outcomes.
-
Curr Opin Crit Care · Dec 2010
ReviewUrinary L-type fatty acid-binding protein as a new renal biomarker in critical care.
Acute kidney injury (AKI) remarkably increases the mortality of critically ill patients treated in ICUs. Recently, several renal biomarkers have been developed for the early detection of AKI. We review the potential of urinary L-type fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP) as a new renal biomarker for AKI diagnosis in critical care. ⋯ Recent data suggest that urinary L-FABP can contribute to the development of new AKI diagnostic tools in critical care. Combining with other renal markers such as neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), optimal threshold determination for distinguishing AKI from chronic renal failure should be explored before translation to the clinical.
-
Conflicts occur frequently in the ICU. Research on ICU conflicts is an emerging field, with only few recent studies being available on intrateam and team-family conflicts. Research on communication in the ICU is developing at a faster pace. ⋯ Data about ICU conflicts depend on conflict definition, study designs (qualitative versus quantitative), patient case-mix, and detection bias. Conflicts perceived by caregivers are frequent and consist mainly in intrateam conflicts. The two main sources of conflicts in the ICU are end-of-life decisions and communication issues. Conflicts negatively impact patient safety, patient/family-centered care, and team welfare and cohesion. They generate staff burnout and increase healthcare costs. Further qualitative studies rooted in social-science theories about workplace conflicts are needed to better understand the typology of ICU conflicts (sources and consequences) and to address complex ICU conflicts that involve systems as opposed to people. Conflict prevention and resolution are complex issues requiring multimodal interventions. Clinical research in this field is insufficiently developed, and no guidelines are available so far. Prevention strategies need to be developed along two axes: improved understanding of family experience, preferences, and values, as well as evidence-based communication may reduce team-family conflicts and organizational measures including restoring leadership, multidisciplinary teamwork, and improved communication within the team may prevent intrateam conflicts in the ICU.
-
Curr Opin Crit Care · Dec 2010
ReviewTeam working in intensive care: current evidence and future endeavors.
It has recently been argued that the future of intensive care medicine will rely on high quality management and teamwork. Therefore, this review takes an organizational psychology perspective to examine the most recent research on the relationship between teamwork, care processes, and patient outcomes in intensive care. ⋯ Based on findings from the most recent research evidence in medicine and management, four principles are identified for improving the effectiveness of team working in intensive care: engender professional efficacy, create stable teams and leaders, develop trust and participative safety, and enable frequent team reflexivity.