Spinal cord
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
Achieving assessor accuracy on the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury.
A retrospective audit of assessor accuracy using the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) in three multicentre randomised controlled trials (SCIPA: Spinal Cord Injury and Physical Activity) spanning 2010-2014 with standards revised in 2011. ⋯ Given inaccuracies in the manual ISNCSCI worksheets in this long-term clinical trial setting, continued training and a computerised algorithm are essential to ensure accurate scoring, scaling and classification of the ISNCSCI and confidence in clinical trials.
-
A retrospective comparative study. ⋯ Our data demonstrated that there may be improved neurologic outcomes in patients with SCI who undergo early surgical decompression. Maintenance of MAP ⩾85 mm Hg for 5 consecutive days post-SCI was also associated with higher rates of AIS grade improvement at mean 26.7 days without a statistically significance difference at prolonged follow-up although a higher rate of neurological recovery persisted in patients with MAP ⩾85 mm Hg.
-
Prospective cohort study. ⋯ The incidence of penetration or aspiration according to VFSS is high in this cohort of patients with TCSCI. Therefore, the swallowing function of patients with acute TCSCI should be routinely evaluated before initiating oral feeding. VFSS is highly recommended, particularly to rule out the possibility of silent aspiration and to achieve information on safe nutrition consistency.