Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society
-
Neuroprosthetic devices can improve quality of life by providing an alternative option for motor function lost after spinal cord injury, stroke, and other central nervous system disorders. The objective of this study is to analyze the outcomes of implanted pulse generators that our research group installed in volunteers with paralysis to assist with lower extremity function over a 25-year period, specifically, to determine survival rates and common modes of malfunction, reasons for removal or revision, and precipitating factors or external events that may have adversely influenced device performance. ⋯ Incidence of malfunction is similar to, whereas infection rates are slightly higher than, other commonly implanted medical devices. Future investigations will focus on infection prevention, modifying techniques on the basis of recipient demographics, lifestyle factors, and education, and integrating similar experience of motor neuroprostheses used in other applications.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Motor Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Low Risk of Bias.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has shown promising results in enhancing motor recovery after stroke, but nuances regarding its use, such as the impact of the type and site of stimulation, are not yet established. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with low risk of bias to investigate the effect of rTMS on motor recovery after both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. ⋯ Current literature supports the use of rTMS for motor recovery after stroke, especially when done within six months and for patients with more severe stroke at baseline. Future studies with larger sample sizes may be helpful in clarifying the potential of rTMS in poststroke rehabilitation.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Motor Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Low Risk of Bias.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has shown promising results in enhancing motor recovery after stroke, but nuances regarding its use, such as the impact of the type and site of stimulation, are not yet established. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with low risk of bias to investigate the effect of rTMS on motor recovery after both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. ⋯ Current literature supports the use of rTMS for motor recovery after stroke, especially when done within six months and for patients with more severe stroke at baseline. Future studies with larger sample sizes may be helpful in clarifying the potential of rTMS in poststroke rehabilitation.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Efficacy and Safety of Noninvasive Electrical Neuromodulation for Treatment of Functional Constipation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Functional constipation (FC) is a prevalent disorder with large disease burden and high associated cost. Noninvasive electrical neuromodulation (NEN) has been studied for treatment of FC, but its overall efficacy and safety remain unclear. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of NEN for treatment of FC. ⋯ NEN relieves constipation symptoms, improves quality of life, and reduces use of pharmacologic remedies in adults with FC. These effects seem to be modulated through improved autonomic function and rectal sensation. NEN is safe, well-tolerated, and has a high level of patient compliance.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Efficacy and Safety of Noninvasive Electrical Neuromodulation for Treatment of Functional Constipation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Functional constipation (FC) is a prevalent disorder with large disease burden and high associated cost. Noninvasive electrical neuromodulation (NEN) has been studied for treatment of FC, but its overall efficacy and safety remain unclear. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of NEN for treatment of FC. ⋯ NEN relieves constipation symptoms, improves quality of life, and reduces use of pharmacologic remedies in adults with FC. These effects seem to be modulated through improved autonomic function and rectal sensation. NEN is safe, well-tolerated, and has a high level of patient compliance.