Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society
-
Review Meta Analysis
Cylindrical vs Paddle Leads in Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Long-term Treatment of Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
This systematic review compares the long-term efficacy of cylindrical-lead spinal cord stimulation (CL-SCS) vs paddle-lead spinal cord stimulation (Paddle-SCS) for chronic pain management. ⋯ Paddle-SCS offers superior pain reduction (as measured by the VAS) and a lower migration rate, but a higher infection risk compared with CL-SCS. CL-SCS showed better outcomes as measured by the NRS. The choice between Paddle-SCS and CL-SCS should be individualized according to patient-specific factors and treatment goals. Further research with rigorous study designs is needed to provide clearer comparisons between these interventions.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Noninfectious Complications of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) has emerged as a promising treatment for chronic neuropathic pain. However, its safety and complications are not fully understood, with existing literature primarily based on case reports, observational studies, and data base analyses. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the prevalence of noninfectious complications associated with DRGS, focusing on the trial phase, postimplantation period, and revisions, while identifying risk factors for these outcomes. ⋯ DRGS shows a safety profile comparable to that of spinal cord stimulation, with similar rates of lead migrations and fractures. Improvements in surgical techniques, technology, and clinician expertise are expected to reduce complications. Future research should standardize reporting practices and detail implantation techniques to better understand and refine best practices in DRGS implantation.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Motor Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Low Risk of Bias.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has shown promising results in enhancing motor recovery after stroke, but nuances regarding its use, such as the impact of the type and site of stimulation, are not yet established. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with low risk of bias to investigate the effect of rTMS on motor recovery after both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. ⋯ Current literature supports the use of rTMS for motor recovery after stroke, especially when done within six months and for patients with more severe stroke at baseline. Future studies with larger sample sizes may be helpful in clarifying the potential of rTMS in poststroke rehabilitation.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Efficacy and Safety of Noninvasive Electrical Neuromodulation for Treatment of Functional Constipation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Functional constipation (FC) is a prevalent disorder with large disease burden and high associated cost. Noninvasive electrical neuromodulation (NEN) has been studied for treatment of FC, but its overall efficacy and safety remain unclear. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of NEN for treatment of FC. ⋯ NEN relieves constipation symptoms, improves quality of life, and reduces use of pharmacologic remedies in adults with FC. These effects seem to be modulated through improved autonomic function and rectal sensation. NEN is safe, well-tolerated, and has a high level of patient compliance.
-
Review Meta Analysis
A Mechanistic Analysis of the Neural Modulation of the Inflammatory System Through Vagus Nerve Stimulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the antiinflammatory effects of various VNS methods while exploring multiple antiinflammatory pathways. ⋯ Pooling all VNS techniques indicated the ability of VNS to modulate inflammatory markers such as CRP, IL-10, and IFN-γ. Individually, methods such as taVNS were effective in modulating IL-1ß and IL-10, whereas iVNS modulated IL-6. However, different VNS techniques should be separately analyzed in larger, homogeneous, and powerful studies to achieve a clearer and more consistent understanding of the effect of each VNS method on the inflammatory system.