Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society
-
Objective. Our objective was to determine the efficacy of peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNFS) for the treatment of chronic lower back pain. PNFS is becoming increasingly recognized as a safe, minimally invasive, and easily reversible treatment for a variety of chronic pain conditions. Chronic low back pain is a common cause of disability and one that is difficult to treat effectively. ⋯ Results. In each case presented here, PNFS enabled patients to decrease their pain medication and increase their level of activity. The patients all reported reduction in pain as measured by visual analog scale scores and an improved quality of life. Conclusion. We conclude that PNFS is a safe and effective alternative treatment for patients with chronic low back pain, and should be considered in this population.
-
Objectives. Electrical brain stimulation is used as a treatment for patients with intractable chronic pain and movement disorders. However, the implantation of electrodes and electrical stimulation may induce histological changes around the electrode tip. We aimed to review the histological changes in humans that were electrically stimulated in the brain. ⋯ Macroscopic lesions were present in only some cases, mostly due to pulling at the extension cable in the postoperative evaluation period preceding definite implantation of the electrode wire and stimulator. Conclusions. Electrical brain stimulation induces histological changes in some patients. According to electrical brain stimulation studies in animals, these changes can be related to the charge and charge density per phase (and their interaction).
-
Introduction. Early animal and human evidence existed for a postsynaptic dorsal column (PSDC) pathway for visceral nociception that, when lesioned, decreased pain of terminal illness. There have been recent anecdotal reports in the literature that spinal cord stimulation (SCS) reduces pain of visceral nociception. We present here a review of the literature supporting a hypothesis that SCS might work by modulating information through the spinothalamic tracts (STT) and PSDC. ⋯ Conclusions. Chronic visceral nociception may be secondary to visceral sensitization and hyperalgesia and can be affected by the spinal cord and brain, the "brain-gut" axis. There is preclinical evidence and clinical anecdotes that this nociceptive information is transmitted in the central nervous system through the PSDC pathway and LSTT and that SCS decreases pain of visceral nociception. It may be that SCS works by modulation of the above pathways.
-
Repositioning of a subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation lead alleviated a parkinsonian patient's dyskinesias without the need for parkinsonian medication reduction. After the initial placement and programming, the patient was doing well. During repair of a skin erosion, the lead moved ventral and the patient developed severe dyskinesias and, when the deep brain stimulation system was on, diplopia. ⋯ The electrode was moved dorsally by about 6 mm. Intraoperatively the patient's dyskinesias stopped with no diplopia with the stimulator on. Two years after the revision the patient is doing very well.
-
Objective. Employing [(18) F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) to assess the correlation between the effect of deep brain stimulation (DBS) on the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and the regional cerebral metabolic rate of glucose (rCMRGlc) in advanced Parkinson's disease patients (N = 8). Materials and Methods. On the basis of patients' diary records, we performed FDG-PET during the off-period of motor activity with on- or off-stimulation by STN-DBS on separate days and analyzed the correlation between changes in motor symptoms and alterations in the rCMRGlc. Result. When FDG-PET was performed, the motor score on the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) was 64% lower with on-stimulation than with off-stimulation (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon single-rank test). ⋯ Among the items of the UPDRS motor score, the changes in resting tremor and rigidity of the left extremities showed a significant correlation with the changes in rCMRGlc observed in the right premotor area (p < 0.02 and p < 0.05, respectively, Spearman's rank correlation). Conclusions. STN-DBS either activates the premotor area or normalizes the deactivation of the premotor area. These FDG-PET findings obtained are consistent with the idea that STN-DBS modifies the activities of neural circuits involved in motor control.