Journal of clinical monitoring and computing
-
J Clin Monit Comput · Aug 2019
Pediatric blood pressures during anesthesia assessed using normalization and principal component analysis techniques.
Expected values for blood pressure are known for both unanesthetized and anesthetized children. The statistics of changes in blood pressure during anesthesia, which may have important diagnostic significance, have not been reported. The purpose of this study was to report the variation in changes in blood pressure in four pediatric age groups, undergoing both cardiac and non-cardiac surgery. ⋯ Variations in systolic blood pressure over a 5-min period were wider: in non-cardiac from 0.1 (12.2) mmHg (first month) to 0.4 (11.5) mmHg (5-6 year old) and from 0.2 (12.5) to 0.4 (14.2) mmHg in cardiac cases. Absolute blood pressures and changes in blood pressure during anesthesia in pediatric cardiac and non-cardiac surgical cases have been analyzed from a population database. Using these values, the quantitative methods of normalization and principal component analysis allow the identification of statistically significant changes.
-
J Clin Monit Comput · Aug 2019
Comparative Study Observational StudyEvaluation of cardiac output variations with the peripheral pulse pressure to mean arterial pressure ratio.
Cardiac output (CO) optimisation during surgery reduces post-operative morbidity. Various methods based on pulse pressure analysis have been developed to overcome difficulties to measure accurate CO variations in standard anaesthetic settings. Several of these methods include, among other parameters, the ratio of pulse pressure to mean arterial pressure (PP/MAP). ⋯ After PE (n = 256) and NA (n = 121) boluses, ΔPPrad/MAP positively tracked ΔCO (r = 0.53 and 0.41 respectively, p < 0.001). By contrast, there was no relation between ΔPPrad/MAP and ΔCO after EP boluses (r = 0.10, p = 0.39). ΔPPrad/MAP tracked ΔCO variations during PE and NA vasopressor challenges. However, after positive fluid challenge or EP boluses, ΔPPrad/MAP was not as performant to track ΔCO which could make the use of this ratio difficult in current clinical practice.