The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
-
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. · Jul 1993
Comparative StudyComparison of exogenous gonadotropins and pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone for induction of ovulation in hypogonadotropic amenorrhea.
To compare the efficacy and safety of ovulation induction with exogenous gonadotropins vs. pulsatile GnRH in patients with hypogonadotropic amenorrhea, results from 30 patients in 111 cycles of gonadotropins and 41 patients in 118 cycles of pulsatile GnRH were analyzed retrospectively. Exogenous gonadotropins were administered using an individually adjusted protocol, using a starting dose of 150 IU. Pulsatile GnRH was delivered iv at a physiological frequency based upon our normative data. ⋯ Mean peak preovulatory E2 levels were significantly higher in the gonadotropin group (1684.5 +/- 124.4 vs. 1315.3 +/- 74.9 pmol/L; P < 0.05). The mean luteal phase P level 1 week after ovulation was significantly higher than normal in the gonadotropin group (84.9 +/- 10.8 vs. 61.1 +/- 3.2 nmol/L; P < 0.05), but was not significantly different from that in the pulsatile GnRH group (70.3 +/- 6.0 nmol/L). We conclude that pulsatile GnRH, when compared to exogenous gonadotropins, results in high rates of ovulation and conception, but a decreased risk of multiple folliculogenesis, higher order multiple gestations, and ovarian enlargement.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)