Journal of neurophysiology
-
Comparative Study
Adaptive control for backward quadrupedal walking. I. Posture and hindlimb kinematics.
1. To gain new perspectives on the neural control of different forms of quadruped locomotion, we studied adaptations in posture and hindlimb kinematics for backward (BWD) walking in normal cats. Data from four animals were obtained from high-speed (100 fr/s) ciné film of BWD treadmill walking over a range of slow walking speeds (0.3-0.6 m/s) and forward (FWD) treadmill walking at 0.6 m/s. 2. ⋯ At the hip, angular motion was unidirectional, as the hip flexed during BWD stance but extended during FWD stance. Knee extension was the prime contributor to horizontal displacement of the body during BWD stance, but hip extension was the prime contributor to horizontal displacement during FWD stance. 6. Our kinematic data revealed two discriminators between BWD and FWD walking.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
-
1. To compare the basic hindlimb synergies for backward (BWD) and forward (FWD) walking, electromyograms (EMG) were recorded from selected flexor and extensor muscles of the hip, knee, and ankle joints from four cats trained to perform both forms of walking at a moderate walking speed (0.6 m/s). For each muscle, EMG measurements included burst duration, burst latencies referenced to the time of paw contact or paw off, and integrated burst amplitudes. ⋯ At the ankle joint, flexion during the E2 phase (yield) of stance was minimal or absent for BWD walking, and ankle extension during BWD stance was accompanied by a ramp increase in LG-EMG activity. At the knee joint, the yield was also small (or absent) for BWD walking, and increased VL-EMG amplitudes were associated with the increased range of knee extension for BWD stance. 5. Although the uniarticular hip extensor (anterior biceps femoris, ABF) was active during stance for both directions, the hip flexed during BWD stance and extended during FWD stance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
-
1. Intracellular recordings were made from 28 granule cells and 6 periglomerular cells of the rat olfactory bulb during odor stimulation and electrical stimulation of the olfactory nerve layer (ONL) and lateral olfactory tract (LOT). Neurons were identified by injection of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) or biocytin and/or intracellular response characteristics. ⋯ Periglomerular (PG) cells showed a response to ONL stimulation that was unlike that found in other olfactory bulb neurons. There was a long-duration hyperpolarization after a spike and large depolarization or burst of spikes (20-30 ms in duration). Odor stimulation produced simple bursts of action potentials, Odor stimulation produced simple bursts of action potentials, suggesting that PG cells may simply follow input from the olfactory nerve.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)