Journal of neurophysiology
-
Laser radiant-heat pulses selectively excite the free nerve endings in the superficial layers of the skin and activate mechano-thermal nociceptive afferents; when directed to the perioral or supraorbital skin, high-intensity laser pulses evoke a blink-like response in the orbicularis oculi muscle (the laser blink reflex, LBR). We investigated the functional properties (startle or nociceptive origin) of the LBR and sought to characterize its central pathways. Using high-intensity CO(2)-laser stimulation of the perioral or supraorbital regions and electromyographic (EMG) recordings from the orbicularis oculi muscles, we did five experiments in 20 healthy volunteers. ⋯ In response to paired stimuli, the LBR recovered significantly faster than R2. These findings indicate that the LBR is a nociceptive reflex, which shares part of the interneuron chain mediating the nonnociceptive R2 blink reflex, probably in the medullary reticular formation. The LBR may prove useful for studying the pathophysiology of orofacial pain syndromes.
-
Comparative Study
Responses of superficial dorsal horn neurons to intradermal serotonin and other irritants: comparison with scratching behavior.
Scratching behavior is used to assess itch sensation in animals, but few studies have addressed the relative scratch-inducing capacity of different algesic and pruritic chemicals. Furthermore, central neural mechanisms underlying itch are not well understood. We used electrophysiological and behavioral methods to investigate the ability of several irritant chemicals to excite neurons in the superficial dorsal horn, as well as to elicit scratching, in rats. ⋯ In rats, 5-HT appears to be more pruritogenic than histamine as assessed by scratching and shaking behavior, and excites superficial dorsal horn neurons over a behaviorally relevant time course. However, because most neurons additionally responded to pain-producing stimuli, they are not itch-specific. They might nonetheless contribute to neural pathways that distinguish between pain and itch based on some neural mechanism such as frequency coding.
-
Noxious stimulation of spinal afferents inhibits primate spinothalamic tract (STT) neurons in segments distant from the region of afferent entry. Inhibitory effects of cardiopulmonary sympathetic afferent (CPSA) stimulation remain after C(1) transection but disappear with spinal transection between C(3) and C(7). We hypothesized that spinal inhibitory effects produced by CPSA stimulation are processed by neurons in C(1)-C(3) segments. ⋯ Mechanical stimulation of somatic fields excited 30 of 41 neurons tested. All neurons activated by visceral input received convergent somatic input from noxious pinch of somatic receptive fields that generally included the neck and upper body; 11 C(1)-C(3) propriospinal neurons did not respond to any afferent input examined. Results of these studies were consistent with the idea that modulation of spinal nociceptive transmission might involve neuronal connections in high cervical segments.
-
Laryngeal adductor responses to afferent stimulation play a key role in airway protection. Although vital for protection during cough and swallow, these responses also must be centrally controlled to prevent airway obstruction by laryngospasm during prolonged stimulation. Our purpose was to determine the role of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors in modulating early R1 responses (at 9 ms) and/or later more prolonged R2 responses (at 36 ms) during electrical stimulation of the laryngeal afferent fibers contained in the internal branch of the superior laryngeal nerve in the cat. ⋯ In each of these experiments, NMDA receptor blockade did not have significant effects on cardiac or respiratory rates in any of the animals. The results demonstrate that NMDA receptors play an essential role in long latency R2 laryngeal responses to laryngeal afferent stimulation. On the other hand, early R1 laryngeal adductor responses are likely to involve non-NMDA receptor activation.
-
Magnocellular red nucleus (RNm) is involved in controlling goal-directed limb movements such as reaching to grasp. We tested two hypotheses related to RNm's role in controlling reach-to-grasp movements. One hypothesis is that forelimb RNm neurons are grasp specific, and the other is that they specify the timing of metacarpi-phalangeal (MCP) extension to preshape the hand during the appropriate phase of the reach. ⋯ Analyses of temporal relations between discharge and kinematic data during both the whole-hand and precision tasks indicate that discharge was time locked most frequently to MCP extension and, to a lesser extent, elbow extension during both tasks. We conclude that RNm may command muscle synergies that provide a basic preshape of the hand at the appropriate phase of limb transport. In addition, the timing of RNm's contribution to hand preshaping varies with the behavioral requirements of the task.