J Gynecol Obst Bio R
-
J Gynecol Obst Bio R · Feb 2008
Review Comparative Study[Effects of maternal analgesia and anesthesia on the fetus and the newborn].
Continuous electronic fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring is part of routine care for laboring patients under either systemic or locoregional analgesia. Opioid systemic analgesia (mainly meperidine in early labor), yet less frequently used in our country, is associated with a decrease in FHR-variability and worse acid-base and neonatal status compared to epidural or combined spinal epidural analgesia. ⋯ All these undesirable side effects which may induce severe intrapartum fetal distress must be adequately detected and treated with intrauterine resuscitation techniques, including correction of maternal hypotension and/or the use of tocolytics agents. Reinstallation of electronic fetal monitoring at arrival in the operating room before cesarean section for suspected fetal hypoxia may be helpful to choose better anesthetic technique and try to avoid general anesthesia associated with increased maternal morbidity and mortality.
-
J Gynecol Obst Bio R · Feb 2008
Review[Modality of fetal heart monitoring during labor (continuous or intermittent), telemetry and central fetal monitoring].
Fetal heart monitoring during labor is almost systematic today. Continuous monitoring decreases neonatal convulsions, but increases caesarean section and forceps deliveries without impact on long term neonatal prognosis. Overall, there is no proved impact of cardiac fetal monitoring (continuous or intermittent) on perinatal mortality. ⋯ Telemetry has been poorly evaluated to date but experiences are currently undertaken. Central fetal monitoring does not improve neonatal issue but could increase caesarean section rate. Central of fetal monitoring could help in the organisation and the conservation of fetal heart monitoring.
-
J Gynecol Obst Bio R · Feb 2008
Review[Emergency caesarean delivery: is there an ideal decision-to-delivery interval?].
Among data on medical liability for obstetrical practice in labour ward, one of the claims concerns the decision-to-delivery interval during emergency caesarean section, for which an optimal time is frequently advocated. A realistic review on this subject is needed. ⋯ A detailed analysis of obstetrical context and of each sequence of the decision-to-delivery interval is more efficient and realistic for evaluation in medical liability cases than an optimal "gold standard". In addition, it allows a prophylactic reflexion for a risk management approach in each labour ward.