Progress in brain research
-
Historical Article
Central control of information transmission through the intraspinal arborizations of sensory fibers examined 100 years after Ramón y Cajal.
About 100 years ago, Santiago Ramón y Cajal reported that sensory fibers entering the spinal cord have ascending and descending branches, and that each of them sends collaterals to the gray matter where they have profuse ramifications. To him this was a fundamental discovery and proposed that the intraspinal branches of the sensory fibers were "centripetal conductors by which sensory excitation is propagated to the various neurons in the gray matter". In addition, he assumed that "conduction of excitation within the intraspinal arborizations of the afferent fibers would be proportional to the diameters of the conductors", and that excitation would preferentially flow through the coarsest branches. ⋯ The PAD produced by single, or by small groups of GABAergic interneurons in group I muscle afferents, can remain confined to some sets of intraspinal arborizations of the afferent fibers and not spread to nearby collaterals. In muscle spindle afferents this local character of PAD allows cutaneous and descending inputs to differentially inhibit the PAD in segmental and ascending collaterals of individual fibers, which may be an effective way to decouple the information flow arising from common sensory inputs. This feature appears to play an important role in the selection of information flow in muscle spindles that occurs at the onset of voluntary contractions in humans.
-
The dopaminergic and opioidergic reward pathways of the brain are critical for survival since they provide the pleasure drives for eating, love and reproduction; these are called 'natural rewards' and involve the release of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens and frontal lobes. However, the same release of dopamine and production of sensations of pleasure can be produced by 'unnatural rewards' such as alcohol, cocaine, methamphetamine, heroin, nicotine, marijuana, and other drugs, and by compulsive activities such as gambling, eating, and sex, and by risk taking behaviors. Since only a minority of individuals become addicted to these compounds or behaviors, it is reasonable to ask what factors distinguish those who do become addicted from those who do not. ⋯ A range of other dopamine, opioid, cannabinoid, norepinephrine, and related genes have since been added to the list. Like other behavioral disorders, these are polygenically inherited and each gene accounts for only a small per cent of the variance. Techniques such as the Multivariate Analysis of Associations, which simultaneously examine the contribution of multiple genes, hold promise for understanding the genetic make up of polygenic disorders.