Resp Care
-
Performance of Flutter® (Axcan Scandipharm Inc, Birmingham, AL), Acapella® (Smiths Medicals Inc, Rockland, MA) and Quake® (Thayer Medical, Tucson, AZ) were compared at similar frequencies and amplitudes of oscillations at nine angles of the device in clearing simulated mucus inside a tracheal model (trachea) oriented at three angles with or without simulated constrictions in airway upstream of trachea. ⋯ Mucus clearance can be significantly enhanced by coughing through oscillating positive expiratory devices that generate high amplitude oscillations at moderate frequencies, increasing frontal depths of mucus facing airflow and slightly increasing resistance to airflow in airways in COPD patients.
-
The bedside chest x-ray (CXR) is an indispensible diagnostic tool for monitoring seriously ill patients in the intensive care unit. The CXR often reveals abnormalities that may not be detected clinically. ⋯ The interpretation of the bedside CXRs is often challenging, and requires extensive radiologic experience to avoid misinterpretation of the wide spectrum of pleural and pulmonary disease. The clinical information is of substantial value for the interpretation of the frequently nonspecific findings.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Diagnostic accuracy of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle biopsy in mediastinal lymphadenopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospectively conducted studies to define diagnostic performance of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle biopsy (EBUS-TBNB) in mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy. ⋯ Evidence of moderate quality confirms the high diagnostic performance of EBUS-TBNB for mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy, both in malignant and non-malignant conditions. Available evidence also demonstrates the safety of this procedure.
-
A mass-casualty respiratory failure event where patients exceed available ventilators has spurred several proposed solutions. One proposal is use of a single ventilator to support 4 patients. ⋯ Using a single ventilator to support 4 patients is an attractive concept; however, the V(T) cannot be controlled for each subject and V(T) disparity is proportional to the variability in compliance. Along with other practical limitations, these findings cannot support the use of this concept for mass-casualty respiratory failure.