Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
[Dose-response study of preincisional buprenorphine on emergence time and postoperative analgesic requirement in patients anesthetized with sevoflurane].
The effect of intravenous buprenorphine on emergence time from sevoflurane anesthesia and postoperative analgesic requirement was evaluated after otolaryngeal surgeries. Forty-five patients were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups (n = 15 each): Control-group received saline as a control; 2 micrograms-group received buprenorphine 2 micrograms.kg-1; and 4 micrograms-group received buprenorphine 4 micrograms.kg-1, respectively. Study drug was administered intravenously at the induction of general anesthesia. ⋯ In the control-group, the 2 micrograms-group, and the 4 micrograms-group, 10, 1, and 3 patients, requested additional analgesics during the first 24 hours after surgery, respectively (control-group vs. 2 micrograms-group and 4 micrograms-group, P < 0.05). Nausea and vomiting occurred more frequently in the 2 micrograms-group and the 4 micrograms-group. We conclude that buprenorphine (2 or 4 micrograms.kg-1) reduced analgesic requirement during the first 24 hours after surgery without delaying emergence from sevoflurane anesthesia.
-
In six neurosurgical patients we examined their emergence from more than six hours of total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and fentanyl. The anesthesia was maintained properly with total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and fentanyl without nitrous oxide. We calculated the estimated blood concentration of propofol from the anesthesia record using a three-compartment pharmacokinetic model. ⋯ The mean estimated concentration of propofol at the extubation was 1.36 micrograms.ml-1 (range: 1.1-1.5 micrograms.ml-1). The estimated emergence times in these cases, also calculated with the pharmacokinetic model, correlated significantly with the time from discontinuation of propofol infusion to the patients' awakening. It was concluded, first, that the estimated concentration of propofol at extubation after long anesthesia was similar to that measured in common cases, and second, that we could reduce the emergence time at the tail end of long-sustained neurosurgery by avoiding the delay in emergence.
-
A 47-year-old female was scheduled for ulnar osteotomy under general anesthesia combined with brachial plexus block. She had a history of symptomatic epilepsy due to subarachnoid hemorrhage. Immediately after giving 100 mg bolus of propofol to the patient, she developed generalized convulsion similar to a grand mal. ⋯ After that no further convulsive attack occurred. Although it has been known that propofol has anticonvulsive properties, there have been several reported cases of seizure following the administration of propofol. Further studies are needed to clarify the mechanism of seizure induced by propofol in the patients with epilepsy.
-
Finding appropriate endotracheal tube position in children is important, because the trachea length of a child is shorter than that of an adult, and the position of the endotracheal tube is easy to be altered by head position, rotary movements, and flexion as well as extension. We confirmed the correct depth of the endotracheal tube by transillumination method using the Trachlight device in children. Twenty children were intubated orally with a rigid laryngoscope according to the distance of the formula height/10 + 5 cm at the lips. ⋯ The distance between the carina and the tube tip measured by chest radiography was more than 1 cm. Trachlight device was simple and reliable to ensure the appropriate endotracheal tube position in children. We consider that the appropriate depth of the endotracheal tube using any of 4.5, 5.0 or 5.5 mm tube size is 1.5 cm beyond the point the bright light of the Trachlight disappears.
-
A survey of unexpected cardiac arrests, excluding those associated with cardiac surgery, that had occurred during anesthesia and surgery in the period 1980-1999 was conducted. There was no significant difference between the number of such cardiac arrests that occurred in the 1980 s (29/36,159, 0.080%) and the number in the 1990 s (33/37,643, 0.088%). According to the classification by Keenan et al., there were 3 cases (0.0083%) in the 80 s and 4 cases (0.0106%) in the 90 s that occurred due to anesthetic management. ⋯ This increase seems to be due to an increase in the number of severe and multiple injuries and an increase in complicated major surgery. The increase in number of cases due to preoperative conditions also depends on coronary spasm and cardiac conduction insufficiency. Taking into consideration the improvement in intraoperative monitoring and the development of novel anesthetics in the 90 s, greater efforts should be made by anesthesiologists to reduce the incidence of cardiac arrest due to anesthetic management, and preoperative evaluation of surgical patients needs to be reconsidered.