Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology
-
Case Reports
[Intravenous sedation with target-controlled infusion (TCI) in patients with difficult airways].
Tracheal intubation was facilitated with an intubating laryngeal mask (ILM) in two patients with difficult airways. Target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol and fentanyl was used for sedation during placement of an ILM. ⋯ Spontaneous ventilation and oxygenation were well maintained throughout the induction. Both patients were satisfied with intravenous sedation using TCI for awake instrumentation of their airways.
-
An incorrect Japanese terminology of "Masuigaku [symbol: see text]" has been used widely to express "anesthesiology" or "anaesthetics" [symbol: see text] since the first Department of Anesthesiology was established in Tokyo University in 1952. The reason why the nomenclature "Masui-gaku" is wrong is as follows: Japanese nomenclatures for clinical medical sciences should include a Chinese character "Ka [symbol: see text]" such as "nai-ka-gaku" for internal medicine, "ge-ka-gaku" for surgery and "gan-ka-gaku" for ophthalmology. Accordingly the name "Masui-gaku" is erroneous to mean "Anesthesiology" and it should be "Masui-ka-gaku" [symbol: see text]. ⋯ Most people consider that "Ma [symbol: see text]" is originated from "[symbol: see text] (Hemp, Asa)" or "[symbol: see text] (Marihuana, Taima)", however, this is definitely incorrect and "Ma [symbol: see text]" of "Ma-sui" has no direct relation with the pharmacological effect of hemp. Thus the misuse of "Masui-ga-ku" might have caused serious academic and social confusions, such as misunderstanding of anesthesiologists as comedical technicians, leading to a poor social acceptance of anesthesiology and anesthesiologists for these fifty years in Japan. To correct this confused situation I would like to ask our colleagues to use correctly these nomenclatures.
-
Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
[Perioperative stress response in elderly patients for elective gastrectomy--the comparison between isoflurane anesthesia and sevoflurane anesthesia both combined with epidural anesthesia].
The difference in stress responses between isoflurane anesthesia (I group) and sevoflurane anesthesia (S group) was studied. Twelve patients for elective gastrectomy were divided into two groups: S group, 7 patients, 78 +/- 4.3 years of age, and I group, 5 patients, 77.4 +/- 6.9 years of age. Anesthesia was induced by fentanyl, midazolam and sevoflurane or isoflurane with 100% oxygen. ⋯ During operation, it was confirmed that the responses of sympathetic nervous system (epinephrine, norepinephrine) and pituitary-adrenocortical system (ACTH, cortisol) were maintained in both groups. After operation plasma norepinephrine levels increased in both groups. Although the responses of I group tended to be stronger than that of S group, there was no significant difference between the two groups.
-
A 49-year-old male with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) was scheduled for gastrectomy. Anesthetic management was performed under general anesthesia with sevoflurane and epidural anesthesia with lidocaine. ⋯ He had little pain and showed no progress in neurological symptoms in the postoperative period. Neuromuscular monitoring is essential in administrating non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents to patients with ALS, and epidural anesthesia may be useful for perioperative management of patients with ALS.
-
We report two cases of tracheal stenosis for endoscopic treatment under general anesthesia with laryngeal mask airway. The tracheal stenosis of the two patients was so close to the glottis that endotracheal tube could not be inserted, and laryngeal mask airway was beneficial for maintaining airway and obtaining operating field. During the procedure, patients breathed spontaneously and we could support their ventilation easily and sufficiently. Endoscopic treatment of the airway obstruction by Nd-YAG laser associated with balloon dilatation and stent is an effective method of relieving the distressing symptom of asphylaxia, and laryngeal mask airway is considered to be useful for performing successful endoscopic procedure.