Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology
-
Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
[Postoperative sore throat--a comparison of standard cuff, gas-barrier cuff and Brandt anesthesia tube cuff].
Excessive intracuff pressure due to nitrous oxide diffusion into the cuff can damage the tracheal mucosa. Several endotracheal tubes have been developed (Trachelon gas barrier type tube, Brandt Anaesthesia tube) to limit nitrous oxide-related intracuff pressure increase. We investigated whether the incidence of postoperative sore throat could be reduced by using these tubes. ⋯ The incidence of postoperative sore throat was not significantly different among the groups, 36% (5/14) in group S, 45% (5/11) in group G, and 33% (4/12) in Group B. This incidence did not correlate with intracuff pressure increase. In conclusion, specially manufactured endotracheal tubes to limit excessive intracuff pressure did not effectively attenuate the incidence of postoperative sore throat in this patient population.
-
A 73-year-old female was scheduled for left upper lobectomy. She had no history of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. During the operation, respiratory sound was clear. ⋯ Inspiratory sevoflurane concentration was 4% at first, and was decreased to 2%. About 20 minutes after starting sevoflurane inhalation, wheezing was reduced. Sevoflurane may be useful in the treatment of bronchospasm after extubation.
-
Case Reports
[What do adolescents desire for the postoperative pain relief?--a speculation from an interview with a patient].
Three different methods of postoperative pain management were evaluated by a 16 year old girl within 1 month after the last surgery who had undergone intrathoracic surgery three times during the six months. The postoperative pain management was different after each surgery. The first bullectomy was performed under thoracoscopy and she did not complain of severe pain with nerve blocks and NSAID suppository. ⋯ Bolus epidural morphine, however, was administered by physicians only, and she endured severe pain for more than two hours until the next dose at the midnight of the operation. That might be the reason why she was not satisfied with epidural morphine. It was concluded that we should try to offer not fluctuating analgesic level but readily available potent analgesics which could be hopefully administered by patients themselves in adolescent or adult population.
-
Forty-five patients scheduled for intra-abdominal gynecological surgeries, ranging in age from 30 to 60 years, were anesthetized with combined spinal-epidural (CSE) method using combined spinal-epidural needles inserted at the L2-3 interspace. Ten minutes after intrathecal administration of 0.4% isobaric tetracaine solution (2.5 ml) the upper level of analgesia was examined by pin prick method and the patients were divided into the group A (N = 7; anesthetic level > or = Th7), B (N = 7; Th8-10) and C (N = 31; Th11-L1) according to their anesthetic levels. Target anesthetic level (Th4-7) was obtained in group B by peridural administration of 2% mepivacaine in a dose of 5 ml and the surgery was performed. ⋯ In group A, no mepivacaine was used in the first hour of the surgery. In all patients, except one in group C, in whom general anesthesia was used after insufficient segmental analgesia, anesthesia was maintained by the CSE technique. We concluded that adequate anesthetic level for the intra-abdominal surgery can be obtained by intrathecal isobaric tetracaine administration combined with peridural mepivacaine of a dose calculated according to the anesthetic level ten minutes after the spinal block.
-
We studied the level of analgesia obtained with epidural injection of 2% mepivacaine using combined spinal and epidural analgesia (CSE) and compared with the level obtained by epidural analgesia (EA). We inserted a catheter into the epidural space through the L2/3 interspace, and hyperbaric tetracaine was injected through the L3/4 interspace with 26G spinal needle in thirty patients for CSE. We checked the the level of analgesia 90 min after spinal anesthesia. ⋯ We also showed the regression line Y = 16.1-0.7X (P < 0.05) for EA 15 min after epidural injection of mepivacaine in other 23 patients. To achieve the same level of analgesia of Th8 or Th6 with CSE and EA, the doses for epidural injection were calculated as 5.5 ml, 10.5 ml with CSE and 11.5 ml, 14.4 ml with EA, respectively. These results show that the epidural dose of local anesthetic for CSE is 1/2 to 2/3 of that necessary for EA.