European journal of anaesthesiology. Supplement
-
Animal and human studies suggest that hypertonic saline is a potential therapeutic agent to assist with the medical treatment of patients with traumatic brain injury. It may have a place as osmotherapy to decrease brain size, predominantly of uninjured brain and has several potential advantages over mannitol. ⋯ Animal studies support its use, but definitive human trials using mortality end-points in brain trauma are lacking. Hypertonic saline may be considered a therapeutic adjunct to the medical management of traumatic brain injury, awaiting definitive evidence to support routine use.
-
Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl · Jan 2008
ReviewDoes multimodality monitoring make a difference in neurocritical care?
In spite of the many tools available for monitoring the central nervous system, there are no clinical trials which prove that continuous monitoring of any single variable in the intensive care unit has had any significant impact on the outcome of patients. Even in the absence of robust evidence proving the efficacy of neuromonitoring tools, we believe it is time to re-examine the basic objectives of neuromonitoring. The main reasons for monitoring neurocritical patients could be summarized as follows: (1) to detect early neurological worsening before irreversible brain damage occurs; (2) to individualize patient care decisions; (3) to guide patient management; (4) to monitor therapeutic response of some interventions and to avoid any consequent adverse effects; (5) to allow clinicians to be able to understand the pathophysiology of complex disorders; (6) to design and implement management protocols; and (7) to improve neurological outcome and quality of life in survivors of severe brain injuries. ⋯ In this review, the obstacles confronted in running randomized clinical trials in this field are discussed. The lack of equipoise and the ethical concerns in conducting such trials are discussed. In addition, the reasons for failure to improve outcome through the use of some monitoring devices are discussed and potential solutions proposed.
-
The most informative neurophysiological techniques available in the neurosurgical intensive care unit are electroencephalograph and somatosensory evoked potentials. Such tools, which give an evaluation of cerebral function in comatose patients, support clinical evaluation and are complementary to neuroimaging. They serve both diagnostic/prognostic and monitoring purposes. ⋯ While somatosensory evoked potentials correlated with short-term outcome, intracranial pressure showed a poor correlation. We believe neurophysiological monitoring is an ideal complement to the other parameters monitored in the neurosurgical intensive care unit. Whereas intracranial pressure is simply a pressure index, electroencephalograph-somatosensory evoked potential monitoring reflects to what extent cerebral parenchyma still remains metabolically active during acute brain injury.
-
Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl · Jan 2008
ReviewHypothermia and neurological outcome after cardiac arrest: state of the art.
Multi-centred studies in patients who remain comatose after cardiac arrest and also in newborn babies with perinatal asphyxia have clearly demonstrated that mild hypothermia (32-34 degrees C) can improve neurological outcome after post-anoxic injury. This represents a highly promising development in the field of neurocritical care. This review discusses the place of mild therapeutic hypothermia in the overall therapeutic strategy for cardiac arrest patients. ⋯ Regarding the use of hypothermia, early induction and proper management of side-effects are the key elements of successful implementation. Treatment should include the rapid infusion of 1500-3000 mL of cold fluids to induce hypothermia and prevent hypovolaemia and hypotension. Educational activities to increase awareness and acceptance of new therapeutic options and European Resuscitation Council guidelines are urgently required.
-
Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl · Jan 2008
ReviewDoes ICP monitoring make a difference in neurocritical care?
Raised intracranial pressure and low cerebral perfusion pressure are associated with ischaemia and poor outcome after brain injury. Therefore, many management protocols target these variables. However, there are no randomized controlled trials that have demonstrated the effectiveness of intracranial pressure-guided care in severely head-injured patients. ⋯ Furthermore, intracranial pressure monitoring and aggressive management of intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure have been associated with increased lengths of stay in the neurocritical care unit, conceivable costs and possibly an increased rate of complications. Against this background, there is sufficient clinical equipoise to warrant an adequately powered randomized controlled trial to compare intracranial pressure-guided care with supportive critical care without intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. However, the realization of such a trial is likely to be problematic for a number of reasons, not least of which the firmly held biases of many clinicians.