European journal of anaesthesiology. Supplement
-
Animal and human studies suggest that hypertonic saline is a potential therapeutic agent to assist with the medical treatment of patients with traumatic brain injury. It may have a place as osmotherapy to decrease brain size, predominantly of uninjured brain and has several potential advantages over mannitol. ⋯ Animal studies support its use, but definitive human trials using mortality end-points in brain trauma are lacking. Hypertonic saline may be considered a therapeutic adjunct to the medical management of traumatic brain injury, awaiting definitive evidence to support routine use.
-
Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl · Jan 2008
ReviewTherapeutic approaches to reduce systemic inflammation in septic-associated neurologic complications.
Treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock often focuses on resolving immediate life-threatening problems related to infection (source control, antibiotics) and providing circulatory, ventilatory and other organ support. Neurologic complications, such as sepsis-associated encephalopathy, frequently occur in septic patients and are associated with higher mortality and long-term complications. As case fatalities and overall mortality continue to decline, long-term cognitive problems are becoming more common among survivors. ⋯ Coupled plasma filtration adsorption is an extracorporeal therapy aimed at the non-specific removal of cytokines and mediators involved in systemic inflammation and immune suppression by the use of plasma filtration coupled to an adsorbent resin cartridge with high affinity for many cytokines and mediators. Several cytokines that are removed by coupled plasma filtration adsorption have also been implicated in blood-brain barrier permeability, leucocyte recruitment and amplification of the inflammatory response. Current studies are ongoing to determine whether treatments such as coupled plasma filtration adsorption may also be beneficial in reducing long-term neurologic complications.
-
Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl · Jan 2008
ReviewEffects of catecholamines on cerebral blood vessels in patients with traumatic brain injury.
Data on the cerebrovascular effects of catecholamines after head injury are difficult both to interpret and to compare. Diverse parameters with regard to brain trauma animal models, methods of determining the effects on the cerebral blood flow and metabolism and choice of end-points have been used. Many studies investigate the cerebrovascular effects of catecholamines over a range of cerebral perfusion pressures above the range recommended by current guidelines. ⋯ For all other catecholamines and related substances there are insufficient data on the cerebrovascular effects after head injury. This suggests that norepinephrine may be the catecholamine that is the most suitable substance to maintain or restore adequate cerebral perfusion. The data, however, are insufficient to formulate a guideline.
-
The most informative neurophysiological techniques available in the neurosurgical intensive care unit are electroencephalograph and somatosensory evoked potentials. Such tools, which give an evaluation of cerebral function in comatose patients, support clinical evaluation and are complementary to neuroimaging. They serve both diagnostic/prognostic and monitoring purposes. ⋯ While somatosensory evoked potentials correlated with short-term outcome, intracranial pressure showed a poor correlation. We believe neurophysiological monitoring is an ideal complement to the other parameters monitored in the neurosurgical intensive care unit. Whereas intracranial pressure is simply a pressure index, electroencephalograph-somatosensory evoked potential monitoring reflects to what extent cerebral parenchyma still remains metabolically active during acute brain injury.
-
Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl · Jan 2008
ReviewDoes multimodality monitoring make a difference in neurocritical care?
In spite of the many tools available for monitoring the central nervous system, there are no clinical trials which prove that continuous monitoring of any single variable in the intensive care unit has had any significant impact on the outcome of patients. Even in the absence of robust evidence proving the efficacy of neuromonitoring tools, we believe it is time to re-examine the basic objectives of neuromonitoring. The main reasons for monitoring neurocritical patients could be summarized as follows: (1) to detect early neurological worsening before irreversible brain damage occurs; (2) to individualize patient care decisions; (3) to guide patient management; (4) to monitor therapeutic response of some interventions and to avoid any consequent adverse effects; (5) to allow clinicians to be able to understand the pathophysiology of complex disorders; (6) to design and implement management protocols; and (7) to improve neurological outcome and quality of life in survivors of severe brain injuries. ⋯ In this review, the obstacles confronted in running randomized clinical trials in this field are discussed. The lack of equipoise and the ethical concerns in conducting such trials are discussed. In addition, the reasons for failure to improve outcome through the use of some monitoring devices are discussed and potential solutions proposed.