Mayo Clinic proceedings
-
The interruption of daily consumption of caffeine-containing beverages can cause headache and other symptoms within 8 hours. Resumption of caffeine alleviates these symptoms. Surgical patients routinely fast preoperatively and may have postoperative symptoms from caffeine withdrawal. ⋯ Perioperative intake of caffeine altered postoperative well-being. Caffeine given preoperatively may limit postoperative withdrawal headaches among the millions of daily drinkers of caffeinated beverages. A randomized, prospective, and blinded trial to test this hypothesis is warranted.
-
Mayo Clinic proceedings · Sep 1993
Biography Historical ArticleLou Gehrig--amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
-
Mayo Clinic proceedings · Aug 1993
ReviewManagement of postoperative pain: influence of anesthetic and analgesic choice.
Improved control of postoperative pain is being increasingly scrutinized yet concomitantly demanded by patients, physicians, and even the federal government. Our ever-increasing subspecialization in medicine has compartmentalized much of perioperative care and has created substantial difficulty for physicians in understanding the overall influence of other physicians' perioperative decisions, including control of pain. ⋯ Additionally, outcome studies show that provision of improved analgesia and minimization of the perioperative stress response enhance clinical outcome in both low- and high-risk patients. This article highlights new information on how anesthetic and analgesic management influences perioperative pain and decreases the incidence of complications in surgical patients.
-
The "duty to warn" has become fixed in US law since the 1976 case of Tarasoff v Regents of the University of California. In that case, the California Supreme Court decided that psychotherapists whose patients make a specific, serious threat of violence against a specific, clearly identifiable potential victim have a duty to warn the intended victim, directly or indirectly, of the threat. Tarasoff inspired several successful and unsuccessful lawsuits. ⋯ The duty to warn is explicitly based on considerations of social utility and, as such, is attractive for courts to expand because an apparently minimal effort by therapists will often prevent substantial harm to victims. Some states have codified the duty to warn in a statute, but other states have refused to adopt the Tarasoff reasoning. In the absence of clear legal decisions to the contrary, psychotherapists may well anticipate that the duty to warn operates in their states.