Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology
-
Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. · Jun 2021
Meta AnalysisColchicine treatment can improve outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Currently, there is no widely acceptable and proven effective treatment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Colchicine has been shown to offer a benefit in reducing the inflammation in several inflammatory diseases. This study aims to analyze the efficacy of colchicine administration and outcomes of COVID-19. ⋯ This meta-analysis showed that the administration of colchicine was associated with improvement of outcomes of COVID-19 [OR 0.43 (95% CI 0.34-0.55), p < 0.00001, I2 = 0%, fixed-effect modelling] and its subgroup which comprised of reduction from severe COVID-19 [OR 0.44 (95% CI 0.31-0.63), p < 0.00001, I2 = 0%, fixed-effect modelling] and reduction of mortality rate from COVID-19 [OR 0.43 (95% CI 0.32-0.58), p < 0.00001, I2 = 0%, fixed-effect modelling]. Our study suggests the routine use of colchicine for treatment modalities of COVID-19 patients. More randomized clinical trial studies are still needed to confirm the results from this study.
-
Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. · Aug 2020
Meta AnalysisDexmedetomidine in the prevention of postoperative delirium in elderly patients following non-cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
The efficacy of dexmedetomidine in the prevention of postoperative delirium (POD) remains ambiguous, however, it has been used to reduce the incidence of delirium in elderly patients. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis study for assessing the effects of dexmedetomidine on POD among elderly patients following non-cardiac surgery. A systematic literature search was performed against the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases, and all relevant literature published till November 30, 2019, were considered. ⋯ However, patients who received dexmedetomidine had a higher incidence of bradycardia and hypotension. In conclusion, the meta-analysis revealed that dexmedetomidine appears to decrease the risk of POD in elderly patients following non-cardiac surgery. However, as some of the studies were heterogeneous and of low quality, high-quality trials are necessary for drawing more definitive conclusions.
-
Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. · Aug 2015
Meta AnalysisEfficacy of perioperative dexmedetomidine in postoperative neurocognitive function: a meta-analysis.
Neuroprotective effects of dexmedetomidine are reported in preclinical and clinical studies but evidence regarding the postoperative neurocognitive function is not as clear. This study performed a meta-analysis on outcomes of studies which examined neurocognitive performance by using valid assessment tools before and after perioperative dexmedetomidine treatment. Literature was searched in several electronic databases and studies were selected by following précised inclusion criteria. ⋯ Perioperative dexmedetomidine treatment was associated with significantly better neurocognitive performance in comparison with saline (mean difference (95% CI): 9.10 (3.03, 15.16) %; P = 0.003) as well as with comparator anaesthetics (mean difference: 5.50 (0.15, 10.86) %; P = 0.04) treated patients. In the submeta-analyses of studies which utilized neurocognitive assessment tools other than Mini-Mental State Examination (mean difference: 6.66 (-3.42, 16.74); P = 0.20) or studies with patients under 60 years of age (mean difference: 7.48 (-3.00, 17.96); P = 0.16), the differences were not significant between dexmedetomidine- and saline-/comparator-treated patients. Perioperative dexmedetomidine treatment is associated with significantly better neurocognitive function postoperatively in comparison with both saline controls and comparator anaesthetics (predominantly midazolam).
-
Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. · Aug 2015
Meta AnalysisEffect of perioperative dexmedetomidine on the endocrine modulators of stress response: a meta-analysis.
This study examined the effects of perioperative dexmedetomidine treatment on physiological modulators of surgical stress response. The quality of the included studies was assessed prior to performing meta-analyses of the weighted mean differences in the changes from baseline of stress hormones and interpreted in the light of statistical heterogeneity between the studies. Nineteen studies (844 surgical subjects) data were used for this meta-analysis. ⋯ Dexmedetomidine also decreased prolactin levels with a mean difference of -19.42 (-39.37, 0.52) μg/L (P = 0.06). In conclusion, perioperative use of dexmedetomidine reduces serum catecholamine and cortisol levels but the decrease in cortisol levels was not statistically different from the comparator anaesthetics. More data will be required to assess the effects of dexmedetomidine on corticotropin, prolactin, and growth hormone.