The American journal of anesthesiology
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Analgesia after inguinal herniorrhaphy with laparoscopic inspection of the peritoneum in children. Caudal block versus ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric block.
The authors prospectively evaluated the efficacy of caudal epidural block versus local infiltration combined with ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric block for analgesia after inguinal herniorrhaphy with laparoscopic inspection of the peritoneum. During standardized anesthetic care, 24 children were randomized to Group I (caudal epidural block with 1.2 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine) or to Group II (local infiltration with an ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric block). Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower at all four evaluation points in Group I than in Group II. ⋯ Time to extubation was 3.8 +/- 0.5 minutes in Group I and 8.2 +/- 1.1 minutes in Group II. The time from arrival in the postanesthesia care unit until discharge home was 113 +/- 3 minutes in Group I and 152 +/- 11 minutes in Group II. Caudal epidural block was more effective than local infiltration in controlling pain after herniorrhaphy with laparoscopy in children and resulted in earlier discharge home.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Effect of patient-controlled sedation on recovery from ambulatory monitored anesthesia care.
Patient-controlled sedation (PCS) with propofol has been shown to be an effective means of conscious sedation during monitored anesthesia care. The purpose of this study was to assess both the intraoperative conduct and postoperative recovery of patients receiving propofol for conscious sedation, randomized to either PCS or anesthetist-controlled sedation (ACS). Forty-three patients scheduled for outpatient procedures requiring monitored anesthesia care were randomized to PCS or ACS. ⋯ More patients in the PCS group required oxygen supplementation (saturation < 90%) on admission to recovery (P < 0.05). At 1 hour after recovery admission, however, there were no differences between groups. These results indicate that when patients determine their own sedation, they are more sedated at the end of a procedure than when the anesthetist determines the level of sedation.