Articles: analgesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[The effect of propofol-ketamine anesthesia on hemodynamics and analgesia in comparison with propofol-fentanyl].
Propofol (Diprivan), a modern intravenous hypnotic, produces a reduction in both cardiac index (CI) and mean arterial pressure (MAP). Ketamine (Ketanest), a potent analgesic, in contrast, causes an increase in MAP and CI. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the combination of propofol and ketamine can give better hemodynamic stability during the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia than propofol used with fentanyl, whose cardiodepressant actions may cumulate. ⋯ Patients in group B showed better vigilance as well as better pain relief postoperatively. The population of the fentanyl group was obviously more deeply sedated and analgesia was still inadequate. In our study general intravenous anesthesia with propofol and ketamine offered the advantages of better analgesia, a higher state of vigilance and the absence of respiratory depression during the postoperative phase compared with the combination of propofol and fentanyl.
-
A technique of continuous infusion epidural anesthesia was used during labour in 933 patients divided into three groups according to age: Group A (14-18 years old), Group B (19-35 years old) and Group C (greater than 35 years old). Infusion was carried out using the following system: a PVC pressurized bag containing 0.3% marcain connected to 2 flow regulators which ensured a flow of 6 ml/h. During the dilatation phase, 85% of patients received sufficient analgesia, whereas 15% required extra boluses. ⋯ The incidence of Caesarian section was 5.6% in Group A, 9% in Group B and 14.8% in Group C. No maternal complication was observed. Epidural anesthesia via continuous infusion was therefore shown to be an efficacious and safe method for ensuring analgesia during labour.
-
Thirty patients who had undergone elective anterolateral thoracotomy were studied in the surgical intensive care unit to compare the analgesic effectiveness of i.v. self-administered buprenorphine (group A) with that of epidural administration (group B) and of s.c. administration by a nurse of 0.3 mg buprenorphine every 3-4 h (group C, controls). Every 2 h the patients were asked to record their subjektive pain level as a percentage on an analogue scale: zero was to be used for no pain and 100% for the most severe pain they could imagine. the mean of all analogue scores for pain in the first 36 h was 19.4+/-3.1 for group A; 18.4+/-2.3 for group B and 42.0+/-7.4 for group C (P<0.025). When the mean scores were referred to time, it seemed that groups A and B suffered a little more pain immediately after the operation; however, after 4 h the mean scores for these groups were far lower than that for the control group. ⋯ Nurses should be instructed to provide analgesic medication on demand. Epidural administration of buprenorphine is superior to self-administration in terms of the amount of drugs used and the dosing intervals. In the quality of analgesia epidural administration and self-administration are equal and superior to the control procedure.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
A randomised double-blind study of interpleural analgesia after cholecystectomy.
Continuous interpleural analgesia provided by 4 hourly injections of 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% with adrenaline 5 micrograms/ml was compared with placebo in a randomised, double-blind study after cholecystectomy. All patients self-administered intravenous morphine using a patient-controlled analgesia device. There was a highly significant difference in mean morphine consumption between the groups (72 mg as compared with 22 mg). ⋯ The mean peak venous plasma bupivacaine concentration after the sixth dose was 3.03 micrograms/ml and no symptoms suggestive of local anaesthetic toxicity occurred. It is concluded that this regimen can provide effective and continuous analgesia after cholecystectomy and that combined administration of interpleural bupivacaine and systemic morphine is more effective than morphine alone in the immediate postoperative period. The doses of bupivacaine required for optimal use of the technique lead to significant total plasma bupivacaine concentrations within 24 hours.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Subcutaneous-PCA: an alternative to IV-PCA for postoperative pain management.
Patients (n = 120) undergoing major orthopedic (e.g., total hip replacement), urologic (e.g., radical prostatectomy), or gynecologic (e.g., total abdominal hysterectomy) procedures were randomly assigned to receive either morphine or oxymorphone postoperatively using a patient-controlled analgesic (PCA) delivery system. The opioid analgesic was administered either intravenously (IV-PCA) or subcutaneously (SQ-PCA) during the 72-h study period. ⋯ Postoperative analgesia scores and patient satisfaction were similar in all four PCA treatment groups. Thus, SQ-PCA with either oxymorphone or morphine represents a clinically acceptable alternative to IV-PCA in the treatment of postoperative pain.