Articles: postoperative-pain.
-
Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. · Jun 1988
Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical TrialAnalgesic effect of picenadol, codeine, and placebo in patients with postoperative pain.
A double-blind, parallel study was conducted to evaluate the analgesic effect and safety of a single 25 mg oral dose of picenadol, a centrally acting analgesic, and to compare it with a 60 mg dose of codeine and a placebo in patients with postoperative pain. Two sites using similar protocols enrolled a total of 178 inpatients with postoperative pain. ⋯ Both picenadol and codeine were significantly more effective than placebo in reducing pain intensity (mean sum of pain intensity difference scores: picenadol 5.21, codeine 5.19, and placebo 2.82) and increasing total relief (mean total pain relief: picenadol 10.21, codeine 11.07, and placebo 6.96). Adverse experience profiles were similar among the three treatment groups.
-
The postoperative analgesic effect of opiate premedication and local anaesthetic blocks was studied in 929 patients having orthopaedic surgery. The median time to first request for postoperative analgesia was less than 2 h when neither opiate premedication nor block was used; opiate premedication increased the time significantly to more than 5 h; local anaesthetic block produced a further significant increase to 8 h and opiate premedication used with local anaesthetic block extended the median time further to more than 9 h. ⋯ Age had no significant effect. Prolonging the time before more pain relief is required may be worthwhile for both patients and staff.
-
There is no uniform etiology of cancer pain. It is essential to understand the pathogenesis of pain as far as possible before a therapeutic modality can be conceived. The anatomical relation of the painproducing lesion to the site of pain perception should be clear (local, projected and referred pain). ⋯ Due consideration is given to neuroleptics and antidepressive drugs. Information about hormones (corticosteroids, calcitonin a. o.) in cancer pain therapy conclude this survey. Enormous differences of morphine use (Austria: 0.66 kg vs Denmark 16.59 kg per million people per year) indicate that there is a great demand for further professional education in this field.
-
Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
Topical anesthesia with lidocaine aerosol in the control of postoperative pain.
Postoperative pain was assessed in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Ten patients received lidocaine aerosol in the surgical wound before skin closure, ten patients received placebo aerosol devoid of lidocaine, and ten patients were untreated. The lidocaine-treated group had significantly lower pain scores and meperidine requirements during the first postoperative day compared to the control groups. ⋯ Results show that lidocaine aerosol used as topical anesthetic in the surgical wound is simple to use, and results in a long-lasting reduction of pain after a single administration. Moreover, postoperative mobilization is facilitated, and the requirement for postoperative analgesics is reduced. Wound healing was normal, and no adverse reactions to lidocaine were reported.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Postoperative analgesia by continuous extradural infusion of bupivacaine and diamorphine.
Three solutions administered by continuous extradural infusion for postoperative analgesia were compared in a randomized, double-blind manner. All patients underwent major abdominal gynaecological surgery and received 0.125% bupivacaine in 0.9% saline, diamorphine in 0.9% saline (0.5 mg in 15 ml) or diamorphine mixed with 0.125% bupivacaine (0.5 mg in 15 ml), at a rate of 15 ml h-1. The bupivacaine-diamorphine mixture provided significantly superior analgesia compared with either bupivacaine or diamorphine alone. No major side effects were encountered.