Articles: general-anesthesia.
-
Comparative Study
Safety and Efficacy of Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia for Distal Vessel Thrombectomy.
Anesthesia modality for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for distal and medium vessel occlusions remains an open question. General anesthesia (GA) may offer advantages over conscious sedation (CS) because of reduced patient movement facilitating catheter navigation, but concerns persist about potential delays and hypotension affecting collateral circulation. ⋯ The use of CS during EVT seems to be safe and feasible with regard to successful recanalization, hemorrhagic complications, clinical outcome, and mortality. In addition, it may be associated with a higher rate of ENI. Further randomized studies in this specific EVT subpopulation are warranted.
-
Numerous, sometimes conflicting, changes in brain functional connectivity have been associated with the transition from wakefulness to unresponsiveness at induction of general anesthesia. However, relatively few studies have looked at the detailed time evolution of the transition, for different electroencephalogram (EEG) frequency bands, and in the clinical scenario of surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia. ⋯ Propofol-induced loss of consciousness in surgical patients is associated with a global breakdown in low-frequency directed functional connectivity, coupled with a high-frequency increase between closely located brain regions. At loss of consciousness, Granger causality shows more pronounced changes than coherence.
-
Review Meta Analysis Comparative Study
Comparison of different monitors for measurement of nociception during general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
To avoid underdosing or overdosing of analgesic medications, a variety of nociception monitors that use distinct techniques have been developed to quantify nociception during general anaesthesia. Although prior meta-analyses have examined the behaviour of nociception monitors vs standard care protocols, they did not include the potentially valuable data for monitor-to-monitor comparisons. In order to capture these data fully and compare the behaviour of these monitors, we conducted a systematic search and network meta-analysis. ⋯ Apart from pupillometry, no monitors demonstrated a significant effect on intraoperative opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes indicate limited clinical benefit for patients when using these monitors.
-
Meta Analysis Comparative Study
High PEEP with recruitment maneuvers versus Low PEEP During General Anesthesia for Surgery - a Bayesian individual patient data meta-analysis of three randomized clinical trials.
The influence of high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with recruitment maneuvers on the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications after surgery is still not definitively established. Bayesian analysis can help to gain further insights from the available data and provide a probabilistic framework that is easier to interpret. The objective was to estimate the posterior probability that the use of high PEEP with recruitment maneuvers is associated with reduced postoperative pulmonary complications in patients with intermediate-to-high risk under neutral, pessimistic, and optimistic expectations regarding the treatment effect. ⋯ High PEEP with recruitment maneuvers demonstrated a moderate reduction in the probability of postoperative pulmonary complication occurrence, with a high posterior probability of benefit observed consistently across various prior beliefs, particularly among patients who underwent laparoscopy.