Articles: pain-measurement.
-
Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol · Dec 1988
Unreliability of the Cold Pressor Test Method in pain studies.
The Cold Pressor Test Method is one of the most widely used techniques in laboratory pain studies. Many research projects use it to evaluate analgesic therapies, including pharmacological methods. However, a review of these projects shows that both the way in which the test is applied and the results obtained from it differ widely. ⋯ We have analyzed the effect of test repetition on parameters normally used in this method. Our results show great variability, especially in some subjects, in the measurement of pain threshold, withdrawal threshold and subjective pain. Standardization of the technique, design of new evaluation methods and continual recording of the way in which subjects interact with laboratory conditions must be developed if we want to find valid results with the Cold Pressor Test method in pain studies.
-
Psychophysical experiments were carried out on 7 human participants to determine the extent to which experimentally produced first or second pain is reduced by concomitant nociceptive stimulation of body regions remote from those at which test stimuli are presented. This form of pain reduction has been termed diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC). Test stimuli used to evoke first and second pain consisted of intense electrical pulses delivered to the ankle area by subepithelial electrodes. ⋯ All of these results closely parallel electrophysiological observations about DNIC in primates. Since the extent of reduction of first pain is relatively weak and the durations of all inhibitory effects are very brief, it is unlikely that DNIC subserves the functions of relieving pain or providing a mechanism of coding pain. The spatial and temporal pattern of DNIC indicates that it may be a phenomenon associated more with the organization and production of withdrawal reflexes than with the relief of pain or pain coding.
-
Bull. Tokyo Med. Dent. Univ. · Sep 1988
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialRelationship between subjective pain estimation and somatosensory evoked potentials by electrical tooth stimulation.
The relationship between the amplitude of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) and the subjective pain estimation using a visual analogue scale (VAS) was examined in 8 volunteers undergoing randomized electrical tooth stimulation with 3 different intensities. Randomized stimulation was used instead of repetitive stimulation with a fixed intensity in order to minimize the phenomena of habituation and expectancy in recording the SEP and VAS. The VAS scores increased significantly with the stimulus intensity. ⋯ There was a significant correlation between the amplitude of N160-P300 and the VAS scores. These findings indicate that the component between 160 and 300 msec reflects the perceived pain intensity and the psychological evaluation processes such as cognition, meaning, interpretation and appreciation of pain. The method of randomized stimulation can serve as a simple and useful way for the objective or subjective pain estimation.
-
The aim of this study was to evaluate a new modified visual analog scale, called the dolorimeter, together with a verbal rating scale (VRS) and a linear visual scale (VAS), in the measurement of acute postoperative pain. The scales were evaluated with reference to their sensitivity, reliability and validity, and correlation. During the study 200 patients 11-70 years of age (125 men, 75 women) were interviewed after orthopedic surgery to ascertain the intensity of the pain. ⋯ On the other hand, the high sensitivity of the two analog scales which patients can use to determine their individual pain intensity proved to be much more sensitive. All three methods correlated statistically; the highest correlation coefficients were found between the analog scales VAS and the dolorimeter. Because the dolorimeter is clearly preferred to the other methods, especially by elderly patients, we came to the conclusion that the dolorimeter is less abstract than the VAS and more practical to handle.
-
Comparative Study
Cluster headache pain vs. other vascular headache pain: differences revealed with two approaches to the McGill Pain Questionnaire.
We compared cluster headache pain and other vascular (migraine and mixed) headache pain on pain intensity ratings and the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). Cluster headache sufferers reported not only more intense pain and more affective distress, but also different pain qualities than did migraine and mixed headache sufferers. The pain qualities that best distinguished cluster headaches from other vascular headaches were the presence of punctate pressure and thermal sensations and the absence of dull pain. ⋯ This finding may have occurred because MPQ subscale scores include an intensity component and do not provide information about specific pain qualities such as that provided by MPQ sensory items. These findings provide evidence that cluster headaches are characterized by distinct pain qualities and are not simply a more intense version of the same vascular headache pain experienced by migraine and mixed headache sufferers. They further suggest than when the MPQ is used to assess specific pain qualities, sensory items and not the sensory subscale are the preferred units for analysis.