Articles: intubation.
-
Review Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Simulation technique for difficult intubation: teaching tool or new hazard?
This investigation evaluated the risks of a simulation drill designed to improve the skill of anesthesia personnel in dealing with an unexpected difficult intubation. In a controlled prospective study, 40 patients with normal airways scheduled to undergo noncardiothoracic surgery were randomized into two groups of 20 patients. In the control group, intubation was performed by standard techniques. ⋯ There were five uncomplicated esophageal intubations in the simulation group compared with none in the control group (p = 0.001). No other adverse events were recorded. The potential hazards of esophageal intubation should be considered before this simulation drill is performed.
-
Presented here is a case of unilateral pulmonary edema following acute subglottic edema after removal of an endotracheal tube. A 3-year-old boy, diagnosed as having nondiphtheric croup and pectus excavatum deformity, was scheduled for repair of a cleft lip. ⋯ After reintubation of the trachea, frothy pink fluid was discharged from the tube, and chest roentgenogram showed a right-sided alveolar infiltrate. Many factors may cause unilateral pulmonary edema, but it is suggested that acute subglottic edema and unilateral bronchial fragility strongly affected this episode.
-
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jan 1990
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Intubation in otorhinolaryngologic surgery: propofol versus propofol-suxamethonium].
This study was carried out to assess the conditions of intubation in head and neck surgery when using propofol alone or associated with suxamethonium. Sixty patients were randomly allocated in two groups of 30. Group I was given 3 mg.kg-1 propofol and Group II 3 mg.kg-1 propofol immediately followed by 1.5 mg.kg-1 suxamethonium. ⋯ Opening of the glottis was found to be better in group II than in group I (p less than 0.01) and bucking was more frequent in group I (p less than 0.01). Successful intubation was obtained after one attempt at a similar rate in the two groups. The haemodynamic variations consisted in a significant decrease of systolic blood pressure compared to the initial value but these variations were similar in the two groups at each time (2.3 and 5 min) from induction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)