Articles: pain-clinics.
-
This is the first in a series of publications presenting the results of a taskforce on quality assurance in psychological assessment of chronic pain. The initiative was motivated by the increasing and confusing variety of newly developed German instruments and/or translations of Anglo-American instruments. Our main work was therefore concentrated on the collection of existing German assessment instruments, on summarizing the essentials in a documentary sheet, and on examining their objectivity, reliability, validity, clinical relevance, economy and degree of empirical foundation. For each diagnostic domain we thus elaborated specific differential recommendations for those working in psychological pain research and clinical practice, in an attempt to devise criteria enabling them to choose the optimal instrument or test battery for their needs and conditions.
-
Unfortunately, sharp, severe pain in the area of distribution of the fifth cranial nerve is frequently termed trigeminal neuralgia, and no differentiation is made between typical and atypical neuralgia and other types of facial pain disorders. This can lead to inadequate treatment. ⋯ The process of differential diagnosis is critical in trigeminal neuralgia, because an incorrent or missed diagnosis is one of the most frequent causes of treatment failure. As idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia, craniomandibular disorders or the cervical spine syndrome can involve similar symptoms and response to the use of medication, close interdisciplinary cooperation in the process of diagnosis is recommended.
-
Since the development during the sixties of the pioneer pain clinics in the United-States, the need of a pluridisciplinary approach of the chronic pain patient has progressively compelled recognition. The principles of organization of this new care units--the pin center--are now clearly determined. It has become classic to compare acute pain as a warning symptom with chronic pain as an illness in itself with its constellation of psychosocial factors. ⋯ Neurophysiological, neuropsychological and behavioral differences legitimate the acute/chronic distinction. We will consider the following items: the types of patient, the multidisciplinary model, the team functioning, the initial consultation, the multidisciplinary synthesis discussion, the somatician role, the psychiatrist role and the possible disadvantages. Beside the care mission, multidisciplinary pain centers also have a key role in clinical research and teaching.
-
In 1986 the World Health Organisation (WHO) proposed an analgesic ladder for the effective therapy of cancer pain. The three standard analgesics making up this ladder are aspirin (non-opioid), codeine (weak opioid) and morphine (strong opioid). Adjuvant drugs may be added at any level. However, before 1986 step II analgesics (weak opioids) had never been tested in cancer pain relief. ⋯ The use of the WHO guidelines "by mouth, by the clock and by the ladder" is now the mainstay of cancer pain management. Because of the guidelines' simplicity they found general acceptance and helped to establish an international pain therapy standard for worldwide use. Nevertheless, there is no scientific validation of WHO step II. In the absence of prospective controlled randomized trials additional longterm results are necessary. We need more data on the use of WHO step II and an update of the published guidelines taking account of modern sustained-release drugs. Up to now, step II of the WHO guidelines for cancer pain is not a clinical reality but at best a didactic instrument.
-
A 21-year-old man suffered from diffuse low back pain and sciatica for 10-s periods once or twice a day over a period of 6 months. After this, pain became chronic and was resistant to conventional conservative treatment. Only acetylsalicylic acid diminished pain. ⋯ The time between onset of symptoms and final diagnosis was 18 months. Symptoms disappeared after surgery. Clinical and radiological aspects of the case are discussed.