Articles: personal-protective-equipment.
-
Review Comparative Study
A Comparison of Personal Protective Standards: Caring for Patients With Ebola Virus.
The purpose of this article is to discuss the variance in requirements for personal protective equipment (PPE) used among healthcare workers to treat patients actively infected with the Ebola virus in West Africa. ⋯ The rapid decline in Ebola mortality is multifactorial. The efforts of US military medical personnel likely were a contributing factor in this rapid decline as those international health workers were afforded the latest in PPE training with strict attention to detail. US military medical personnel, in concert with other governmental agencies, created a potent force multiplier in the efforts to curb this deadly infection. The educational initiative was essential to the slowdown in the spread of the Ebola virus in Liberia. Recommendations for a detailed review of the PPE standards and variances in practice from both WHO and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are necessary to standardize processes across international healthcare workers to expedite the care for future infectious disease outbreaks. A possible solution is to modify the PPE process to standardize with the WHO guidelines. Key stakeholders from all levels (staff nurse, clinical nurse specialist, nurse managers, infectious disease experts, etc) need to be heavily involved in this process.
-
Revue de l'infirmière · Feb 2016
[Ebola crisis in Guinea: psychosocial support for patients and caregivers].
The experience of the French military health service in the fight against the Ebola epidemic in Guinea, highlights the importance of what favours the emergence of an institutional life in a context of care faced with numerous constraints and extraordinary challenges. The meticulous drawing up of procedures and the juxtaposition of expertise goes hand in hand with the construction of a triangular care system (caregivers-patients-families). This relational approach ensures each player in this system is able to find their place and a balance between constraints and satisfactions, losses and successes, isolation and support. This balance seems to favour individual and group resilience.
-
Workplace health & safety · Feb 2016
Ebola Care and Lack of Consensus on Personal Protective Respiratory Equipment.
The Ebola epidemic in West Africa presents a considerable occupational risk to the health personnel involved. The principal mode of virus transmission to health care personnel is through direct contact with the patient, although transmission by aerosols through the air may also occur. Many safety protocols have been suggested relating to personal protection and particularly respiratory protection. ⋯ However, the degree of respiratory safety escalates from a mask, to an adequate respirator, and finally to a whole body suit with integrated helmet and positive air pressure. Recent publications demonstrate a lack of consensus on the degree of safety necessary. The step from "safe enough" to being "absolutely safe" seems, in most countries, insurmountable because of costs and logistics.
-
J Int Soc Respir Prot · Jan 2016
Physiologic Effects from Using Tight- and Loose-Fitting Powered Air-Purifying Respirators on Inhaled Gases, Peak Pressures, and Inhalation Temperatures During Rest and Exercise.
The goal of this investigation was to evaluate the physiologic stresses of powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs) used by workers in many industries (e.g., health care, automobile repair, public safety, building trades, etc.) during rest and three levels of energy expenditure. Twelve men and twelve women wore one tight-fitting and three loose-fitting PAPRs at rest (REST) and while walking for four minutes at oxygen consumption (V̇O2) rates of 1.0 l·min-1(LOW), 2.0 l·min-1 (MODERATE), and 3.0 l·min-1 or maximum (HIGH). Minimum inhaled carbon dioxide concentration (FICO2), maximum inhaled oxygen concentration (FIO2), peak inhalation pressure, and end inhalation temperature were measured continuously breath-by-breath. ⋯ Among all PAPR models, peak inhalation pressures were negative at V̇O2 > LOW, suggesting that peak inhalation flow was greater than blower flow. Results using the variables reported here suggest that PAPRs used at various levels of energy expenditure may be tolerated among healthy workers. Further research is needed to determine the source of supplemented air when inhalation flow exceeds blower flow.