Articles: critical-illness.
-
Semin Respir Crit Care Med · Dec 2024
ReviewAspiration after critical illness: role of endotracheal tube, tracheostomy, swallowing disorders.
Swallowing is a complex process that involves over 50 muscles and nerves and has two critical roles: passing food from the oral cavity through the pharynx and into the esophagus and preventing contents from entering the airway. If a patient's swallowing physiology or airway protective mechanisms are disturbed, the airways and the lungs have innate defense systems to protect against injury and infection. However, critically ill patients are more likely to develop dysphagia, which is an impairment or malfunction in any aspect of the swallowing mechanism, due to the numerous interventions they undergo. ⋯ Further research is necessary to help determine the best ways to prevent and manage pulmonary aspiration in critically ill patients. Several interventions are essential in preventing and managing dysphagia and the sequelae of swallowing dysfunction. Further research is needed to help elucidate the best way to avoid and manage pulmonary aspiration in critically ill patients.
-
The profiles of intensive care cnit (ICU) critically ill inpatients differ from those of other hospitalized patients, since organ dysfunction is a factor that increases the risk for Refeeding Syndrome (RS) development. It is important to understand the influence of feeding methods and caloric intake on mortality and RS incidence among critically ill adult inpatients. A systematic search, following PRISMA guidelines and protocol for systematic reviews, was conducted for interventional and experimental studies analyzing RS occurrence in adults admitted to ICUs. ⋯ Enteral feeding was the most used method, and, in general, progression of caloric intake did not follow the American Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) or National Institute of Health and Care (NICE) recommendations for RS. In majority, data collection period of studies was less than 7 days; RS was observed in up to 52.5% of patients, and related mortality varied between 15.6 and 83.3%. Due to weak level of evidence and high heterogeneity found within reviewed studies, it is not possible to determine a robust recommendation as to what would be the best and safest feeding method and caloric progression protocol for patients at risk for developing RS.
-
Journal of critical care · Dec 2024
ReviewMachine learning for predicting mortality in adult critically ill patients with Sepsis: A systematic review.
Various Machine Learning (ML) models have been used to predict sepsis-associated mortality. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the methodologies employed in studies to predict mortality among patients with sepsis. ⋯ ML models demonstrate a modest improvement in predicting sepsis-associated mortality. The certainty of these findings remains low due to the high risk of bias and significant heterogeneity. Studies should include comprehensive methodological details on calibration and hyperparameter selection, adopt a standardized definition of sepsis, and conduct multicenter prospective designs along with external validations.
-
Curr Opin Crit Care · Dec 2024
ReviewProtective mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients after surgery.
This review aims to provide an updated overview of lung protective strategies in critically ill patients after surgery, focusing on the utility of postoperative open-lung ventilation during the transition from the operating room to the intensive care unit. ⋯ Mechanical ventilation in surgical patients should adhere to lung protective strategies (i.e., individualizing positive end expiratory pressure and prioritize alveolar recruitment) during the transition from the operating room to the intensive care unit.
-
Curr Opin Crit Care · Dec 2024
Editorial ReviewProtective hemodynamics: a novel strategy to manage blood pressure.
This editorial aims to highlight the evolving concept of protective hemodynamics in the management of critically ill patients. ⋯ The implications of adopting protective hemodynamics are profound for both clinical practice and research. Clinically, this approach can reduce iatrogenic harm and improve long-term outcomes for critically ill patients. For research, it opens new avenues for investigating individualized hemodynamic management strategies that prioritize overall patient stability and long-term health over rigid target attainment.