Articles: anesthetics.
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Nov 1985
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA controlled study on the effect of epidural analgesia with local anaesthetics and morphine on morbidity after abdominal surgery.
A hundred patients scheduled for elective abdominal surgery were randomized to either general anaesthesia (low-dose fentanyl) and systemic morphine for postoperative pain or combined general anaesthesia and epidural analgesia with etidocaine 1.5% intraoperatively (T4-S5) and bupivacaine 0.5% 5 ml/4 h for 24 h and morphine 4 mg/12 h for 72 h. Postoperative pain was better controlled by the epidural regimen (P less than 0.0001). We found no significant reduction in postoperative mortality (6% to 2%), pneumonia (28% to 20%), cardiac dysrhythmia (10% to 5%) and wound complications (14% to 11%) by the epidural analgesic regimen. ⋯ Postoperative weight loss and decrease in serum-albumin and serum-transferrin, as well as the reduction in haemoglobin and the need for postoperative transfusions, were similar in the two groups. Convalescence, as assessed by postoperative fatigue, restoration of bowel function (flatus, bowel movement and food intake) and the time until the patients were self-aided at their preoperative level, was not reduced by epidural analgesia. Since 50% of the patients in each group suffered from one or more of the above-mentioned postoperative complications, this epidural regimen was not effective in reducing postoperative morbidity after major abdominal surgery despite the achievement of adequate pain relief.
-
Assessment of pain on injection of the emulsified formulation of di-isopropylphenol (propofol, 'Diprivan') was undertaken in 120 unpremedicated patients and comparison made with thiopentone. A high incidence of pain (37.5%) was found using dorsal hand veins, but use of forearm veins showed only a 2.5% incidence of pain. The use of intravenous lignocaine immediately before propofol injection only partially reduced the incidence of pain using dorsal hand veins (17.5%). A degree of cardiorespiratory depression accompanied induction but the incidence of other side effects was low.
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Nov 1985
Circulatory changes during high thoracic epidural anaesthesia--influence of sympathetic block and of systemic effect of the local anaesthetic.
Circulatory changes during high thoracic epidural anaesthesia (TEA) were studied in nine healthy volunteers by means of echocardiography and systolic time intervals. The subjects also underwent a physical work test with bicycle ergometry. To evaluate the systemic effect of the local anaesthetic (bupivacaine), the same subjects were investigated 3 weeks later when a corresponding dose of the local anaesthetic was injected intramuscularly instead of epidurally. ⋯ Following i.m. injection of bupivacaine, SV decreased 8% and CO 20%. The pre-ejection period/left ventricular ejection time ratio increased 23% during TEA and 16% after i.m. injection. The results indicate that the circulatory changes did not seem to be caused entirely by the cardiac sympathetic block, but were due partly to the systemic effect of bupivacaine.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Clinical comparison of TAC anesthetic solutions with and without cocaine.
Two preparations of a topical anesthetic solution were compared with regard to their relative effectiveness, the incidence of side effects, and the occurrence of wound infection. Solution A contained tetracaine 0.5%, adrenalin 1:2,000, and cocaine 11.8%; solution B contained the same amounts of tetracaine and adrenalin but no cocaine. Children less than 10 years old who presented with facial or scalp lacerations were randomized into the A and B groups. ⋯ Drowsiness or excitability following the use of solutions A and B occurred in 10.7% and 7.8%, respectively. There was no convincing evidence, however, that these were causally related, nor was there any statistical correlation. Because of the effectiveness of cocaine-based topical anesthetics in the pediatric population and the relatively low incidence of side effects, including wound infection, it is recommended that topical anesthesia for dermal laceration repair be considered as an alternative to injectable xylocaine.