• Laszlo Hejjel and Elizabeth Roth.
• Heart Institute, Medical Faculty, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary. lhejjel@freemail.hu
• Physiol Meas. 2004 Dec 1; 25 (6): 1405-11.

AbstractHeart rate variability (HRV) analysis is considered a simple method for investigating neurocardiac regulation. However, measures of HRV may be corrupted by technical artifacts. In order to investigate the consequences of digitization errors on the time domain parameters, HRV measures from model tachograms resampled at different rates were compared. Two 375-element tachograms from human ECG tracings were shifted to a mean of 800 ms and stretched to standard deviations (SD) of 5-120 ms in 5 ms steps. All were resampled at 1-10 ms in 1 ms steps, 10 times repetitively at each interval. The mean, SD, relative accuracy error (RAE) and relative precision error (RPE) were calculated from the mean RR-interval, SD (SDNN), root mean square of successive RR-differences (RMSSD) and the percentage of consecutive RR-interval differences greater than 50 ms (pNN50). The RAE and RPE of the mean heart rate were below 0.1%. In the series with 5 ms SD, the SDNN-RAE exceeded 30% at 10 ms SI, its RPE was lower than 2% all through. Resampling the 15 ms SD tachogram at 1, 2, 4, or 10 ms resulted in RMSSD-RAE of 0.7%, 2.5%, 7.8% and 45.1%, respectively, while its RPE remained below 5%. The pNN50 shows poor accuracy and precision. An ECG sampling interval of 1 ms is recommended for HRV analysis without interpolation in order to get accurate time domain measures even in seriously reduced-variability samples. However, a lower sampling rate may be satisfactory in cases where higher variability is expected.

19 keywords...

hide…