• Nutrition · Mar 2021

    2 + 2 (+ 2) = 4: A new approach for appendicular muscle mass assessment by ultrasound.

    • Thiago G Barbosa-Silva, Maria Cristina Gonzalez, Renata M Bielemann, Leonardo P Santos, Caroline Dos S Costa, Menezes Ana Maria B AMB Post-Graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil., and COCONUT Study Group, Brazil.
    • Post-Graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil. Electronic address: tgbsilva@hotmail.com.
    • Nutrition. 2021 Mar 1; 83: 111056.

    ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to develop new appendicular lean mass (ALM) prediction models based on ultrasound and anthropometric measurements.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional assessment of a subsample from a population-based study (COMO VAI?), conducted with community-dwelling individuals ≥60 y of age living in a southern Brazilian city. ALM was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Muscle thickness (MT) from supine participants was assessed by ultrasound on the anterior aspect of both upper and lower limbs. Such measures, along with anthropometric data, were used to develop prediction models (multivariable linear regression) through the backward stepwise method.ResultsThe study included 190 participants composed mainly of women, white, and middle-class individuals. The best ALM predictive performance was achieved by a model based on two "lengths" (height and arm length), two circumferences (dominant arm and thigh), and two ultrasound-measured MTs (dominant arm and thigh): R2 = 0.90, limits of agreement: ±2.36 kg. Closely satisfactory results were also achieved by an "abbreviated" model composed by the two aforementioned "lengths" and MTs (R2 = 0.89, limits of agreement: ±2.51 kg). ALM estimates from both equations were unbiased and similar to DXA measurements (P = 0.13 and 0.09, respectively). Bootstrap analysis favorably suggested the validity of the models.ConclusionsBased on two ultrasound assessments and a few anthropometric measurements, the developed equations produced accurate and unbiased ALM estimates in the sample. Hence: 2 MTs + 2 lengths (+ 2 circumferences) = 4 limbs' muscle mass. Such models might represent promising alternatives for muscle assessment among older individuals.Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.