-
Preventive medicine · Apr 2021
Randomized Controlled TrialComputer-tailored intervention increases colorectal cancer screening among low-income African Americans in primary care: Results of a randomized trial.
- Susan M Rawl, Shannon M Christy, Susan M Perkins, Yan Tong, Connie Krier, Hsiao-Lan Wang, Amelia M Huang, Esther Laury, Broderick Rhyant, Frank Lloyd, Deanna R Willis, Thomas F Imperiale, Laura J Myers, Jeffrey Springston, Celette Sugg Skinner, and Victoria L Champion.
- Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America; Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America. Electronic address: srawl@iu.edu.
- Prev Med. 2021 Apr 1; 145: 106449.
IntroductionAlthough African Americans have the highest colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality rates of any racial group, their screening rates remain low.Study Design/PurposeThis randomized controlled trial compared efficacy of two clinic-based interventions for increasing CRC screening among African American primary care patients.MethodsAfrican American patients from 11 clinics who were not current with CRC screening were randomized to receive a computer-tailored intervention (n = 335) or a non-tailored brochure (n = 358) designed to promote adherence to CRC screening. Interventions were delivered in clinic immediately prior to a provider visit. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models analyzed predictors of screening test completion. Moderators and mediators were determined using multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses.ResultsSignificant effects of the computer-tailored intervention were observed for completion of a stool blood test (SBT) and completion of any CRC screening test (SBT or colonoscopy). The colonoscopy screening rate was higher among those receiving the computer-tailored intervention group compared to the nontailored brochure but the difference was not significant. Predictors of SBT completion were: receipt of the computer-tailored intervention; being seen at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center clinic; baseline stage of adoption; and reason for visit. Mediators of intervention effects were changes in perceived SBT barriers, changes in perceived colonoscopy benefits, changes in CRC knowledge, and patient-provider discussion. Moderators of intervention effects were age, employment, and family/friend recommendation of screening.ConclusionThis one-time computer-tailored intervention significantly improved CRC screening rates among low-income African American patients. This finding was largely driven by increasing SBT but the impact of the intervention on colonoscopy screening was strong. Implementation of a CRC screening quality improvement program in the VA site that included provision of stool blood test kits and follow-up likely contributed to the strong intervention effect observed at that site. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00672828.Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.