• Isabelle Beuchat, Jan Novy, Giuseppina Barbella, Mauro Oddo, and Andrea O Rossetti.
• Department of Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
• Acta Neurol. Scand. 2020 Aug 1; 142 (2): 181-185.

BackgroundAfter cardiac arrest (CA), present cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (N20 response of SSEPs) have low predictive value for good outcome and might be redundant with EEG.AimsTo determine whether specific features, or rather global, standardized EEG assessments, are reliably associated with cortical SSEP occurrence after cardiac arrest (CA).MethodsIn a prospective CA registry, EEGs recorded within 72 hours were scored according to the ACNS nomenclature, and also categorized into "benign," "malignant," and "highly malignant." Correlations between EEGs and SSEPs (bilaterally absent vs present), and between EEGs/SSEPs and outcome (good: CPC 1-2) were assessed.ResultsAmong 709 CA episodes, 532 had present N20 and 366 "benign EEGs." While EEG categories as well as background, epileptiform features, and reactivity differed significantly between patients with and without N20 (each P < .001), only "benign EEG" was almost universally associated with present N20: 99.5% (95%CI: 97.9%-99.9%) PPV. The combination of "benign EEG" and present N20 showed similar PPV for good outcome as "benign" EEG alone: 69.0% (95% CI: 65.2-72.4) vs 68.6% (95% CI: 64.9-72.0).ConclusionGlobal EEG ("benign") assessment, rather than single EEG features, can reliably predict cortical SSEP occurrence. SSEP adjunction does not increase EEG prognostic performance toward good outcome. SSEP could therefore be omitted in patients with "benign EEG."© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

25 keywords...

hide…