-
Mayo Clinic proceedings · Aug 2021
Comparative StudyPituitary Tumor Surgery: Comparison of Endoscopic and Microscopic Techniques at a Single Center.
- Jamie J Van Gompel, AtkinsonJohn L DJLDDepartment of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN., Garret Choby, Jan L Kasperbauer, Janalee K Stokken, Jeffrey R Janus, Erin K O'Brien, Jason T Little, Irina Bancos, Caroline J Davidge-Pitts, Dhanya Ramachandran, Justine S Herndon, Dana Erickson, and William L Lanier.
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Electronic address: vangompel.jamie@mayo.edu.
- Mayo Clin. Proc. 2021 Aug 1; 96 (8): 2043-2057.
ObjectiveTo understand the transition from microscopic surgery (MS) to endoscopic surgery (ES) on the pituitary across the United States, we assessed a single institution practicing both procedures to discern advantages and disadvantages for each.Patients And MethodsRetrospective institutional chart review of 534 patients in a large practice over a 6-year period (January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2019) comparing a single MS neurosurgeon with a single ES neurosurgeon operating on the same days.ResultsIn this series, 14% (n=75) of patients had a prior operation, there were no carotid artery injuries, the overall risk for a postoperative infection was 0.4% (n=2), and risk for a postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak requiring treatment was 2.0% (n=11). Mean ± SD hospital stay was 1.3±0.04 days; readmission for any reason within 30 days occurred in 3.4% (n=18) of patients. The mean volumetric resection for MS was 86.9%±1.7% and for ES was 91.7%±1.3% (P=.03). There was a higher rate of notable events (P=.015) with MS, but MS had 16% lower cost and operative times were 48 minutes shorter than for ES (83±7 vs 131±6 minutes). The ES required substantially fewer postoperative secondary treatments such as radiation therapy (P=.003).ConclusionPituitary surgery is a very safe and effective procedure regardless of technique. The MS has shorter operative times and overall lower cost. The ES results in increased volumetric resection and fewer secondary treatments. Both techniques can be valuable to a large practice, and understanding these niches is important when selecting optimal approaches to pituitary surgery for a given patient.Copyright © 2021 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.